首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

舌癌3种化疗方案的费用—效果分析
引用本文:刘和凤 唐燕. 舌癌3种化疗方案的费用—效果分析[J]. 中国药师, 2001, 4(3): 213-215
作者姓名:刘和凤 唐燕
作者单位:安徽医科大学附属口腔医院,合肥,230032
摘    要:目的:探讨3种化疗方案(CVP,PVP,MVP)中治疗舌癌费用-效果的最佳方案,方法:运用药物经济学方法对分别采用一种化疗方案的舌癌病人进行费用-效果分析和比较。结果:经分析3种方案的有效率每升高一介百分点分别增加费用79.63元,82.89元和6.85元;生存期每延长1个月所需费用分别为501.12元,573.90元和389.43元。结论:3种方案中MVP最佳,与CVP、PVP相比具有显著性差异()P<0.05)。

关 键 词:舌癌 费用-效果分析 药物经济学 化疗
修稿时间:2000-12-04

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Three Chemotherapv Regimens in Carcinoma of Tongue
Liu Hefeng,Tang Yan. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Three Chemotherapv Regimens in Carcinoma of Tongue[J]. China Pharmacist, 2001, 4(3): 213-215
Authors:Liu Hefeng  Tang Yan
Abstract:Objectives: To explore the optimal regimen of cost-effectiveness in treatment of carcinoma of tonque in three chemotherapy regimens. Method; The cost-effectiveness was analysed and compared in patients with carcinoma of tonque receiving respectively one of three chemotherapy regimens by pharmacoeconomis method. Result: By analysis, the effective rate raised 1 % , the cost increased RMB 79.63, 82.89, and 60.85 Yuan, respectively; when the survival peroid lengthened one month, the required cost were 501.12, 573.90, and 389.43 Yuan, respectively. Conclusion: MVP was an optimal regimen in three regimens, there was a significant difference(P<0.05) compared with CVP,PVP.
Keywords:Carcinoma of tongue  Cost-effectiveness analysis  Pharmacoeconomics  Chemotherapy
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国药师》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国药师》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号