首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

进展期胃癌腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移规律及其清扫对临床结局的影响
引用本文:詹文华,韩方海,何裕隆,李玉明,彭俊生,蔡世荣,马晋平.进展期胃癌腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移规律及其清扫对临床结局的影响[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(1):17-22.
作者姓名:詹文华  韩方海  何裕隆  李玉明  彭俊生  蔡世荣  马晋平
作者单位:510080,广州,中山大学附属第一医院胃肠胰外科
摘    要:目的 分析进展期胃癌腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移规律,评价该区域淋巴结清扫对临床结局的影响。方法 根据1994—2004年胃癌数据库资料,按1999年日本第13版胃癌规约的淋巴结清扫分类,行D3或D3^+淋巴结清扫(D3组)共126例,分析其淋巴结转移的规律。从同一数据库中选择同一手术组施行D2手术的患者146例(D2组),对两组患者的临床结局进行比较。结果 16a2区及16b1区是No16淋巴结转移常见部位。腹主动脉周围淋巴结转移率T1为3、8%,T2为22、3%,T3为46.8%,T4为32.1%;腹膜播散阴性者其转移率为16、3%,腹膜播散阳性者则为69、5%;浆膜无侵犯者转移率为16.3%,浆膜侵出阳性者则为69.5%。D2和D3组患者手术死亡各2例,并分别有4例和6例出现并发症(P〉0、05)。D3组No16淋巴结转移3枚以下与4枚以上者与D2清扫组的平均生存期、中位生存及生存率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.01);胃癌D3与D2手术后Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ。期、Ⅲb期、Ⅳ期患者平均生存期、中位生存及生存率曲线比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论 胃癌淋巴结转移率与肿瘤侵犯深度和浆膜侵出程度密切相关。腹主动脉周围淋巴结清扫可以提高No16转移淋巴结在3枚以内和阴性患者的5年生存率。

关 键 词:2胃肿瘤  淋巴结清扫  生存率
收稿时间:2005-09-10
修稿时间:2005年9月10日

Disciplinarian of lymph node metastasis and effect of paraaortic lymph nodes dissection on clinical outcomes in advanced gastric carcinoma
ZHAN Wen-hua,HAN Fang-hai,HE Yu-long,LI Yu-ming,PENG Jun-sheng,CAI Shi-rong,MA Jin-ping.Disciplinarian of lymph node metastasis and effect of paraaortic lymph nodes dissection on clinical outcomes in advanced gastric carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2006,9(1):17-22.
Authors:ZHAN Wen-hua  HAN Fang-hai  HE Yu-long  LI Yu-ming  PENG Jun-sheng  CAI Shi-rong  MA Jin-ping
Institution:Department of Gastrointestinopancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China. wenhuazh@21cn.com
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the disciplinarian of lymph node metastasis and evaluate the effect of paraaortic lymph nodes dissection on the clinical outcomes in advanced gastric carcinoma. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six patients who underwent D(3) (including D(3)(+)) radical resection (group D(3)) and 146 patients who underwent D(2) radical resection by the same surgical team (group D(2)) for advanced gastric cancer were enrolled in the present study. The dissected lymph nodes were grouped according to the definition of Japanese Research Society for the Study of Gastric Cancer (JRSGC) (Edition 13th). The lymph node metastasis was analyzed in group D(3). The clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in age, sex, tumor location, Borrman type, histological type and TNM stage between group D(2) and group D(3) (P > 0.05). The No16 lymph node metastatic rate was 3.8%, 22.3%, 46.8% and 32.1% in T(1), T(2), T(3), T(4) stage tumors respectively, 16.3% and 69.5% in the patients with negative and positive serosal invasion respectively; there were no differences in operative mortality (2/126 vs 2/146) and surgical complications (4/126 vs 6/146) between group D(2) and group D(3) (P > 0.05). The 5-year survival rate was 66.5% in group D(3) and 40.2% in group D(2) (P< 0.01). The 5-year survival rates of the patients with I, II, IIIa, IIIb and IV stage tumors who were No16 lymph nodes negative were 94.8%, 95.6%, 72.1%, 58.6%, 59% respectively in group D(3), and 42%, 36%, 27%, 35.6%, 16.3% respectively in group D(2). The 5-year survival rate of the patients with No16 (+) lymph nodes less than 3 was higher than that of the patients with No16(+) lymph nodes more than 3. CONCLUSIONS: No16a2 and No16b1 are the common locations of lymph node metastasis in advanced gastric cancer. The paraaortic lymph node metastasis closely is related with the depth of tumor invasion and serosal invasion. Paraaortic lymph nodes dissection (D(3) or D(3)(+) radical resection) improves the 5-year survival rate of the patients with No16 (-) and No16 (+) lymph nodes less than 3.
Keywords:Stomach neoplasms  Lymph node excision  Survival rate
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号