Epidural analgesia in labour |
| |
Authors: | McGrady, Elizabeth Litchfield, Kerry |
| |
Affiliation: | Directorate of Anaesthesia, Walton Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G4 0SF
Kerry Litchfield, MB ChB FRCA, Clinical Research Fellow University Department of Anaesthesia, 2nd floor Queen Elizabeth Building, 10 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER Tel: 01412 114620/1, Fax: 01412 114622, E-mail: elizabeth.mcgrady{at}northglasgow.scot.nhs.uk (for correspondence) |
| |
Abstract: | Since epidural analgesia was introduced four decades ago forpain relief in labour, controversy has persisted about its effecton the labour process. As a result of this, considerable researchhas been performed and findings have led to changes in practice.Epidurals have been credited with prolonging labour; increasingoxytocin requirements, instrumental and operative delivery rates;and causing maternal pyrexia and postpartum back pain. Thereis increasing evidence that refutes some of these claims. Despite ongoing controversies, epidural rates have increased;25% of women in the UK and 66% of women in the USA receive epiduralanalgesia in labour. The following statement from the AmericanCollege of Obstetricians and Gynecologists summarizes the backgroundto these figures: labour results in severe pain for manywomen. There is no other circumstance where it is consideredacceptable for a person to experience untreated severe pain,amenable to safe intervention, while under a physician's care. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|