Contrast of Pediatric Asthma Management Approaches in a Multicultural and Collectivistic Population

Background. Although asthma is the most prevalent chronic illness in childhood and affects approximately 9 million children, the management approaches used by practitioners may not be efficient from the perspective of families. Clinicians often maintain their usual customs of practice, and the context of the clinical encounter is defined in terms of an individual illness management. In collectivistic and multiethnic settings, the extended kin group or extended family shares responsibility for illness management. The goal of this study is to describe health care providers' strategies to manage children with asthma in a multicultural and collectivistic cultural context. Methods. Data were obtained through semistructured in-depth practitioner interviews. Western-trained and traditional practitioners participated. Results. Narrative analysis strategies produced two major themes: 1) fix the asthma and 2) making connections. Practitioners who perceived their responsibility to fix the asthma (make things physiologically normal) often ran into constraints with dealing with the extended family group. Other practitioners who used strategies of making connections often capitalized on the assistance of others to problem-solve the asthma management. Conclusion. In terms of asthma management, the barriers most frequently reported by practitioners were related to the sociocultural and physical environment. There may be vast differences in asthma management approaches for populations from collectivistic cultural orientation.