Effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on the cardiovascular responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation in the elderly

Background. We compared the effects of remifentanil and alfentanilon arterial pressure and heart rate at induction of anaesthesiaand tracheal intubation in 40 ASA I–III patients agedgreater than 65 yr, in a randomized double-blind study. Methods. Patients received either remifentanil 0.5 µgkg^–1 over 30 s, followed by an infusion of 0.1 µgkg min^–1 (group R) or alfentanil 10 µg kg^–1over 30 s, followed by an infusion of saline (group A). Anaesthesiawas then induced with propofol, rocuronium, and 1% isofluranewith 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Results. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and mean arterialpressure (MAP) decreased after the induction of anaesthesia(P<0.05) and increased for 3 min after intubation in bothgroups (P<0.05), but remained below baseline values throughout.Heart rate remained stable after induction of anaesthesia butincreased significantly from baseline after intubation for 1and 4 min in groups R and A, respectively (P<0.05). Therewere no significant between-group differences in SAP, MAP, andheart rate. Diastolic pressure was significantly higher in groupA than group R at 4 and 5 min after intubation (P<0.05).Hypotension (SAP <100 mm Hg) occurred in four patients ingroup R and three patients in group A. Conclusions. Remifentanil and alfentanil similarly attenuatethe pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation, but theincidence of hypotension confirms that both drugs should beused with caution in elderly patients. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 430–3