Circulating fibronectin affects bone matrix,whereas osteoblast fibronectin modulates osteoblast function |
| |
Authors: | Anke Bentmann Nina Kawelke David Moss Hanswalter Zentgraf Yohann Bala Irina Berger Juerg A Gasser Inaam A Nakchbandi |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Max‐Planck Institute for Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;2. Institute for Immunology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;3. Research Center Karlsruhe, ANKA Facility, 76344 Eggenstein‐Leopoldshafen, Germany;4. Electron Microscopy, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;5. INSERM Unit 831, University of Lyon, Faculty of Medicine R. Laennec, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France;6. Pathology Institute, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;7. Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Musculoskeletal Diseases, 4002 Basel, Switzerland |
| |
Abstract: | The bone matrix is composed mostly of collagen, but the initial and continuous presence of fibronectin was found to be crucial for collagen matrix integrity in vitro. It has been assumed that osteoblasts produce the fibronectin required for bone matrix formation. Using transgenic mice, we conditionally deleted fibronectin in the osteoblasts and in the liver using the cre‐loxP system. We also used mice with mutated fibronectin and conditionally deleted β1‐integrin in osteoblasts to identify the receptor involved in fibronectin effects on osteoblasts. Conditional deletion of fibronectin in the differentiating osteoblasts [using the 2.3 kb collagen‐α1(I) promoter] failed to show a decrease in fibronectin amount in the bone matrix despite evidence of successful deletion. Using these mice we established that osteoblast‐derived fibronectin solely affects osteoblast function. This effect was not mediated by integrins that bind to the RGD motif. Conditional deletion of fibronectin in the liver showed a marked decrease in fibronectin content in the matrix associated with decreased mineral‐to‐matrix ratio and changed biomechanical properties but had no effect on osteoblasts or osteoclasts. In conclusion, osteoblast fibronectin affects osteoblasts function. This does not seem to be mediated by the RGD motif on fibronectin. In contrast, liver‐derived fibronectin affects bone matrix properties without affecting osteoblast or osteoclast function. A novel role for liver‐derived circulating fibronectin thus was defined and delineated from that of locally produced fibronectin. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research |
| |
Keywords: | fibronectin osteoblast liver bone matrix bone formation |
|
|