首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

度洛西汀与氟西汀治疗抑郁症对照研究
引用本文:张军,夏仲,宋传福. 度洛西汀与氟西汀治疗抑郁症对照研究[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2011, 0(8): 908-909
作者姓名:张军  夏仲  宋传福
作者单位:中国.安徽省芜湖市第四人民医院;
摘    要:目的探讨度洛西汀与氟西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效与安全性。方法符合CCM D-3诊断标准的抑郁症70例患者随机分为度洛西汀组和氟西汀组各35例。分别给予度洛西汀与氟西汀治疗6周,采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM D)和副反应量表(TESS)评定其疗效及药物不良反应。结果治疗6周末度洛西汀组和氟西汀组的缓解率分别为85.7%和78%,疗效差异无显著性(χ^2=0.85,P〉0.05)。两组的HAM D、TESS评分无显著性差异(P均〉0.05),两组不良反应均比较轻,无显著性差异(χ^2=0.25,P〉0.05)。结论度洛西汀有快速抗抑郁作用且不良反应较轻,是一种安全有效治疗抑郁症的药物。

关 键 词:度洛西汀  氟西汀  抑郁症  副反应量表

Comparative Study of Duloxetine and Fluoxetine in the Treatment of Depression.
Zhang Jun,Xia Zhong,Song Chuanfu. Comparative Study of Duloxetine and Fluoxetine in the Treatment of Depression.[J]. china journal of health psychology, 2011, 0(8): 908-909
Authors:Zhang Jun  Xia Zhong  Song Chuanfu
Affiliation:Zhang Jun,Xia Zhong,Song Chuanfu.The Forth People's Hospital of Wuhu,Wuhu 241000,P.R.China
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of Duloxetine and Fluoxetine in the treatment of depression.Methods A total of 70 patients with depression were divided into Duloxetine group and Fluoxetine group with 35 each for 6 weeks.Hamilton depressive scale(HAMD) and the treatment emergent symptom scale(TESS) were used to evaluate the efficacy and the side effects.Results The total effective rates of Duloxetine group and Fluoxetine group were 85.7% and 78% respectively,without any statistically significant...
Keywords:Duloxetine  Fluoxetine  Depression  TESS  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号