首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

米氮平与马普替林治疗复发性抑郁症的临床对照研究
引用本文:李秀华,张红卫.米氮平与马普替林治疗复发性抑郁症的临床对照研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2011(8):902-904.
作者姓名:李秀华  张红卫
作者单位:中国.山东省德州市第二人民医院精神卫生中心;
摘    要:目的 评价米氮平治疗复发性抑郁症的疗效及对生活质量的影响.方法 将复发性抑郁症患者60例随机分为米氮平组(30例)和马普替林组(30例),治疗6周,采用汉密尔顿郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、副反应量表(TESS)及生活质量综合评定问卷(GQOLI-74)评定疗效、不良反应和生活质量.结果 治疗6周时...

关 键 词:复发性抑郁症  米氮平  马普替林  病例对照研究  副反应量表

Comparative Study of Mirtazapine and Maprotiline in the Treatmemt of Recurrent Depression.
Li Xiuhua,Zhang Hongwei.Comparative Study of Mirtazapine and Maprotiline in the Treatmemt of Recurrent Depression.[J].china journal of health psychology,2011(8):902-904.
Authors:Li Xiuhua  Zhang Hongwei
Institution:Li Xiuhua,Zhang Hongwei.Mental Health Center,Second People's Hospital of Dezhou City,Shandong Province,Dezhou 25300,P.R.China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effiacy of Mirtazapine in the trentment of recurrent depression and influence on the quality of life.Methods A total of 60 patients with recurrent depression were randomly assigned to Mirtazapine group and Maprotiline group for six weeks treatment.HAMD,HAMA,TESS and GQOLI were used to assess the clinical efficacy,side effects and quality of life.Results At the end of 6 weeks,the efficiencies of both groups were equivalent(χ^2=0.10,P〈0.05).The scores of HAMD and HAMA were reducad more in Mirtazapine group than in Maprotilin group(t=2.43,P〈0.05).The adverse reactions of Mirtazapine were lower and 1ighter than those of Maprotiline.There were signiflcant differences between the two groups in following aspects:physical function,mental health,social function and general quality(P〈0.05 or P〈0.01).Conclusion Mirtaznpine is a safe and ettective antidepressent drug,and it can significantly improve the quality of life in the treatment of recurrent depression.
Keywords:Recurrent depression  Mirtazapine  Maprotiline  Compasative study  TESS  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号