首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种空气消毒机消毒效果比较
引用本文:陆晓燕,须俊明,王建英. 两种空气消毒机消毒效果比较[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2004, 21(1): 40-41
作者姓名:陆晓燕  须俊明  王建英
作者单位:上海市宝山区疾病预防控制中心,上海,201900
摘    要:为比较洁宇牌和豪邦牌空气消毒机静态与动态消毒效果,对其杀灭手术室内空气自然菌的效果进行了观察。结果,在无人状况下,两种空气消毒机消毒处理30min可使空气中自然菌的细菌总数≤200cfu/m~3;在有人状况下,洁宇牌空气消毒机能使空气中的细菌总数下降51.04%,豪邦牌空气消毒机只能使空气中的细菌总数下降22.92%。可见,两种空气消毒机的静态消毒效果接近,洁宇牌空气消毒机在有人情况下消毒效果比豪邦牌好。

关 键 词:空气消毒机  紫外线  自然菌
文章编号:1001-7658(2004)01-0040-01
修稿时间:2003-07-14

COMPARATIVE DISINFECTION EFFICACY OF TWO KINDS OF AIR DISINFECTOR
LU Xiao-yan,XU Jun-ming,WANG Jian-ying. COMPARATIVE DISINFECTION EFFICACY OF TWO KINDS OF AIR DISINFECTOR[J]. Chinese Journal of Disinfection, 2004, 21(1): 40-41
Authors:LU Xiao-yan  XU Jun-ming  WANG Jian-ying
Abstract:In order to compare the static and dynamic disinfection efficacy of Jie-Yu-Brand and Hao-Bang-Brand air disinfectors, their efficacy in killing natural bacteria in air of operating room was observed. The results showed that under unoccupied condition, operation of the 2 kinds of air disinfectors for 30 min could make the total count of natural bacteria in air < 200 cfu/ m3. Under occupied condition, Jie-Yu-Brand air disinfector could reduce the total bacterial count of air by 51.04%, while Hao-Bang-Brand air disinfector could reduce the total bacterial count of air only by 22.92%. It is thus evident that the static disinfection efficacy of the 2 air disinfectors is similar, while the disinfection efficacy of Jie-Yu-Brand air disinfector is better than that of Hao-Bang-Brand air disinfector under occupied condition.
Keywords:air disinfector   ultraviolet rays'   natural bacteria  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号