首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

海博刀与三角刀在经口内镜下肌切开术中疗效的回顾性队列研究
引用本文:龚伟,汤小伟,高悄萍,涂素芳,黄思霖.海博刀与三角刀在经口内镜下肌切开术中疗效的回顾性队列研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2018,35(5):322-326.
作者姓名:龚伟  汤小伟  高悄萍  涂素芳  黄思霖
作者单位:南方医科大学深圳医院消化内科,西南医科大学附属医院消化内科,南方医科大学南方医院消化内科,南方医科大学南方医院消化内科,南方医科大学深圳医院消化内科
基金项目:国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心科技支撑项目(2015BAI13B07);广州市科技计划项目(2014Y2-00088);南方医科大学临床研究培育项目(LC2016PY008)
摘    要:目的 比较海博刀与三角刀在经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)中的临床疗效。方法 采用回顾性队列研究设计,纳入2012年6月至2014年7月因贲门失弛缓症在南方医科大学南方医院接受POEM治疗的患者,术中使用海博刀者为海博刀组,使用注射针和三角刀者为三角刀组,比较两组手术相关参数、术后症状缓解及并发症发生率。结果 共纳入57例患者,其中海博刀组25例,三角刀组32例。两组患者基线特征比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。海博刀组平均手术时间短于三角刀组(55.3±17.7)min比(69.5±9.4)min,P=0.038)];术中平均器械交换次数少于三角刀组(4.5±1.5)次比(10.7±1.7)次,P=0.000]。所有患者无严重不良事件发生。在1年的随访中,海博刀组治疗成功率92.0%(23/25),三角刀组96.9%(31/32),差异无统计学意义(P=0.576)。结论 海博刀能显著缩短POEM手术时间,并且获得与三角刀相似的治疗成功率。

关 键 词:失弛症,贲门  经口内镜下肌切开术  海博刀  三角刀  队列研究
收稿时间:2017/8/1 0:00:00
修稿时间:2018/4/19 0:00:00

Clinical effects of Hybrid knife versus triangular tip on peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia: a retrospective cohort study
Gong Wei,Tang Xiaowei,Gao Qiaoping,Tu Sufang and Huang Silin.Clinical effects of Hybrid knife versus triangular tip on peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia: a retrospective cohort study[J].Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy,2018,35(5):322-326.
Authors:Gong Wei  Tang Xiaowei  Gao Qiaoping  Tu Sufang and Huang Silin
Institution:Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University,,,,
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Hybrid knife versus triangular tip during peroral endoscopic myotomy(POEM) for patients with achalasia of cardia. Methods Data of patients with achalasia of cardia who received POEM in Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University from June 2012 to July 2014 were collected and divided into the Hybrid knife group (using Hybrid knife) and triangular tip group (using injection needle and triangular tip). Procedure-related parameters, symptom relief, and adverse events were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 57 patients were selected, including 25 patients in the Hybrid knife group and 32 in the triangular tip group. There were no significant differences on baseline characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). The mean procedure time was shorter in the Hybrid knife group than that in the triangular tip group (55.3±17.7 min VS 69.5±9.4 min, P=0.038). The mean frequency of devices exchange was less in the Hybrid knife group than that in the triangular tip group (4.5±1.5 VS 10.7±1.7, P=0.000). No serious complications occurred during operation and periodical follow-up in both groups. At one-year follow-up, the treatment success rate was 92.0%(23/25) in the Hybrid knife group and 96.9% (31/32) in the triangular tip group (P=0.576). Conclusion Using Hybrid knife in POEM can shorten procedural time and achieve similar treatment success rate compared to triangular tip.
Keywords:Achalasia  cardia  Peroral endoscopic myotomy  Hybrid knife  Triangular tip  Cohort study
点击此处可从《中华消化内镜杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华消化内镜杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号