MCT、MRI诊断急性胰腺炎价值比较

目的探讨MCT与MRI影像检查对急性胰腺炎（包括急性胆源性胰腺炎）的诊断价值，为急性胰腺炎的影像学诊断提供依据。方法对2005年1月至2007年12月本院住院的164例急性胰腺炎（包括急性胆源性胰腺炎）患者的MCT及MRI检查结果进行综合对比分析。结果MRI对急性胰腺炎诊断的阳性率为89％，MCT的阳性率为88．4％，二者比较差异无显著性（P〉0．05）；MRI（MRCP）对急性胆源性胰腺炎诊断的阳性率为72．4％，MCT的阳性率为53．1％，二者比较差异无显著性（P〉0．05）。结论MCT及MRI均对急性胰腺炎的诊断有重要意义，但MRI（MRCP）对急性胰腺炎病因的诊断价值较高。

Evaluation of multi-slice CT and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of multi-slice CT and magnetic resonance imaging in acute panereatifis （including acute biliary panereafifis.Methods Image data of 164 patients who were treated in our hospital for acute pancreatitis（include acute biliary pancreatitis） during January 2005 to December 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. The diagnostic results of multislice CT and magnetic resonance imaging were compared. Results The positive rate of malefic resonance imaging （magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography） was 89% for the dianosis of acute pancreafifis, and that of multi-slice CT was 88.4%. There was no statistic significance between the two figures;The positive rate of magnetic resonance imaging was 72.4% for acute biliary panereatitis, and that of multi-slice CT was 53.1%. There was no statistic significance between the two figures too. Conclusion Multi-slice CT and magnetic resonance imaging play very important role in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. But Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging （magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatngraphy） was higher than that of CT for acute biliary pancreafitis.