A Randomized Study of Secondary Prevention of Early Stage Problem Drinkers in Primary Health Care |
| |
Authors: | ANDERS ROMELSJÖ ,M.D.,Ph.D.,,LENA ANDERSSON,M.D.,,HAKAN BARRNER,M.D.,,STEFAN BORG,M.D.,Ph.D.,,CLAES GRANSTRAND,M.D.,,OLLE HULTMAN,M.D.,,ANNIKA HÄ SSLER,M.D.,,ANNA Kä LLQUIST,M.D.,,PETER MAGNUSSON,M.D.,,ROLAND MORGELL,M.D.,,KJELL NYMAN,M.D.,,ERS OLOFSSON,M.D.,,EVA OLSSON,M.D.,,ERS RHEDIN,M.D, OLLE WIKBLAD,M.D |
| |
Affiliation: | Karolinska Institute, Department of Social Medicine, Kronan Health Centre, S-172 83 Sundyberg, Sweden. Visiting scholar at the Alcohol Research Group, School of Public Health, UC Berkeley, California, U.S.A.;Brunkeberg District Health Centre, Sweden;Kronan District Health Centre, Sweden;Karolinska Institute, Department of Psychiatry, St Göran's Hospital, Sweden;Bagarmossen District Health Centre, Sweden;Storvreten District Health Centre, Sweden |
| |
Abstract: | The subjects were recruited from participants in a health examination of random samples of the adult population in Stockholm county. Those aged 18–64years who admitted a high alcohol consumption (>40 g 100% ethanol/day) among men and <30 g among women) or had an elevated value of serum-gammaglutamyltransferase (GOT) (cut-off point 1.0 microkatal/l for men and 0.6 microkatal/l for women) or had certain other indications of a high alcohol consumption were included. More severe cases, and those with an elevated GOT due to reasons other than alcohol, were excluded. The remaining subjects, 70 men and 13 women, were allocated at random to either an intervention or a comparison group. An elevated GGT was the main inclusion criteria. The subjects in the comparison group were advised by the general practitioner to cut their alcohol consumption, while those in the intervention group made further visits to their general practitioner, who gave general support and used an elevated GGT as an indication of the recent level of alcohol consumption at consecutive visits. There were three visits on average, so we are comparing a group receiving advice with a group receiving further minimal intervention. At the one-year follow-up there were greater, however not significant, reductions in GGT-level, in self-reported alcohol consumption and in a ‘problem index’ in the minimal intervention group than in the comparison group. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|