首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

PiCCO指导下强化液体管理治疗急性左心衰的临床研究
引用本文:陈进翠,方敏,方志成.PiCCO指导下强化液体管理治疗急性左心衰的临床研究[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2013(3):269-272.
作者姓名:陈进翠  方敏  方志成
作者单位:湖北医药学院附属太和医院重症医学科,湖北十堰442000
摘    要:目的:观察脉搏指示连续心输出量(PiCCO)指导下强化液体管理治疗急性左心衰的疗效。方法:138例急性左心衰患者被随机分为液体管理组(73例)和常规治疗组(65例),以PiCCO监测血流动力学指标:心输出量(CO)、心指数(CI)、胸腔内血管容量指数(ITBVI)、血管外肺水指数(EVLWI)等指导液体管理,测定血浆脑型利钠肽(BNP)、心脏超声测定左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末期内径(LVEDd)评估心功能,监测动脉血气分析评估肺功能状况。结果:治疗1周后,与常规治疗组相比,液体管理组BNP(3283.98±73.91)pg/ml比(1584.26±64.71)pg/ml]水平明显下降(P<0.05);血流动力学CO(3.47±0.14)L.min-1.m-2比(4.59±0.37)L.min-1.m-2]、CI(3.45±0.24)比(4.68±0.75)]明显升高,EVLWI(7.89±0.74)ml/kg比(5.67±0.21)ml/kg]明显减少(P均<0.05);心脏超声提示LVEF(38.61±1.72)%比(47.22±2.13)%]明显提高,LVEDd(53.51±1.98)mm比(46.74±2.01)mm]明显下降(P均<0.05);液体负平衡量(750.23±24.67)ml比(1248.91±87.49)ml]明显增加(P<0.05);血气分析提示动脉血气氧分压(85.32±14.35)mmHg比(101.43±5.87)mmHg]明显提高,肺泡—动脉氧分压差(15.38±3.61)mmHg比(7.53±3.54)mmHg]明显下降(P均<0.05)。结论:脉搏指示连续心输出量指导下强化液体管理可更有效改善心肺功能,与其精确液体管理有关。

关 键 词:心室功能障碍    每搏输出量  血管容量  血管外肺水

Clinical research of enhanced liquid management by PiCCO guidance in patients with acute left heart failure
CHEN Jin-cui,FANG Min,FANG Zhi-cheng.Clinical research of enhanced liquid management by PiCCO guidance in patients with acute left heart failure[J].Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine,2013(3):269-272.
Authors:CHEN Jin-cui  FANG Min  FANG Zhi-cheng
Institution:(Department of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Taihe Hospital of Hubei Medicinal College, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, China)
Abstract:Objective:To observe curative effect of enhanced liquid management under guidance of pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output(PiCCO) on acute left heart failure.Methods:A total of 138patients with acute left heart failure were randomly divided into fluid management group(n=73) and routine treatment group(n=65).Cardiac output(CO),cardiac index(CI),intrathoracic blood volume index(ITBVI) and extravascular lung water index(EVLWI) etc.,were monitored by PiCCO to guide liquid management.Plasma brain natriuretic peptide(BNP),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension(LVEDd) were measured.Arterial blood gas was monitored to assess lung function.Results:Compared with routine treatment group,there was significant decrease in BNP level (3283.98±73.91) pg/ml vs.(1584.26±64.71) pg/ml,P〈0.05 ];There were significant increase in CO (3.47±0.14) L.min^-1.m^-2 vs.(4.59±0.37) L.min^-1.m^-2 ],CI (3.45± 0.24) vs.(4.68±0.75)] and LVEF (38.61±1.72) % vs.(47.22±2.13) % ],and significant decrease in EVLWI (7.89±0.74) ml/kg vs.(5.67±0.21) ml/kg ],LVEDd (59.51±3.01) mm vs.(46.74±2.01) mm ] in fluid management group;There was significant increase in negative liquid balance amount (750.23±24.67) ml vs.(1248.91±87.49) ml ],and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (85.32±14.35) mmHg vs.(101.43±5.87) mmHg ];There was significant decrease in alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (15.38±3.61) mmHg vs.(7.53± 3.54) mmHg ],P〈0.05all in liquid management group.Conclusion:Enhanced fluid management can better improve cardiac and lung function under guidance of pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output,which may be related with accurate and adequate liquid management.
Keywords:Ventricular dysfunction  left  Stroke volume  Vascular capacitance  Extravascular lung water
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号