首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中文版糖尿病压力评价量表的信效度研究
引用本文:程丽,李小妹,高翠霞,惠蓉,杨俊玲,伍育宁. 中文版糖尿病压力评价量表的信效度研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2013, 0(11): 485-488
作者姓名:程丽  李小妹  高翠霞  惠蓉  杨俊玲  伍育宁
作者单位:[1]西安市西安交通大学医学院护理系,710061 [2]西安交通大学第一附属医院 ,710061 [3]陕西省人民医院 ,710061 [4]西安市第一医院 ,710061 [5]西安市第九医院,710061
摘    要:目的 翻译并评价糖尿病压力评价量表(Appraisal of Diabetes Scale,ADS)的信效度,提供一种有效评估糖尿病患者压力的中文版问卷.方法 翻译、修订形成中文版ADS,请10名专家对量表的文化相关性和内容效度进行评定;对243例2型糖尿病患者进行调查,评定该工具的内部一致性、结构效度、效标关联效度、区分效度.间隔2周后对25名患者进行重测,计算重测信度.结果 中文版ADS所有条目均具有较好的文化相关性.中文版ADS内容效度指数为0.96;以糖尿病授权量表和糖化血红蛋白值为效标,其效标关联效度分别为-0.626、0.634;因子分析共提取出3个公因子:对糖尿病的控制、糖尿病对患者的心理影响、糖尿病症状管理的认知和态度,累计方差贡献率为76.44%.中文版ADS的Cronbach's α系数为0.731,重测信度为0.926.结论 中文版ADS具有较高的信度和效度,可作为2型糖尿病患者压力的评价工具.

关 键 词:糖尿病  压力  评价  信度  效度

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale
Abstract:Objective To translate the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS) into Chinese and establish its psychometric properties among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods The content validity of the translated ADS were evaluated by 10 experts. The psychometric properties of Chinese version of ADS were tested in 243 type 2 diabetes patients. Results Psychometric analysis supported the reliability and validity of the C-ADS and three subscales:sense of self-control, psychological impact of diabetes,belief and attitude toward personal effort. These three factors explained 76.44% of the variance. The findings also demonstrated a high factor loading indicating good construct validity of the ADS. The criterion validity was acceptable. The Cronbach's c~ coefficient was 0.731 and the test-retest reliability was 0.926. Conclusion The C- ADS is a reliable and valid measure for patients' stress and psychosocial burden among Chinese people with type 2 diabetes.
Keywords:Diabetes Mellitus  Stress  Appraisal  Reliability  Validity
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号