| 伽玛刀与射频温控热凝治疗三叉神经痛的疗效比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘灵慧,杨骏保,项永生,王黎,陈刚,陈善成. 伽玛刀与射频温控热凝治疗三叉神经痛的疗效比较[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2010, 15(1): 10-12 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘灵慧 杨骏保 项永生 王黎 陈刚 陈善成 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 暨南大学附属第一医院神经外科,广州,510630 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的研究伽玛刀与射频温控热凝技术治疗三叉神经痛的疗效差异。方法回顾性分析131例三叉神经痛病人的治疗效果,其中伽玛刀治疗47例(伽玛刀组),射频温控热凝治疗84例(射频组)。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS评分)对术前、术后病人的三叉神经疼痛程度进行评分。术前伽玛刀组和射频组平均VAS评分分别为7.89和7.95,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结果射频组术后即刻VAS评分0～1分,平均0.61分。伽玛刀组起效时间1周～14个月,平均6个月;VAS评分0～3分,平均1.0分。两组术后VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。伽玛刀组术后并发面部麻木6例;射频组并发面部麻木19例,咬肌瘫痪8例,复视1例和后组脑神经损伤1例;两组并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后随访2个月～3年,射频组3例和伽玛刀组1例有不同程度的疼痛复发。结论伽玛刀和射频热凝治疗三叉神经痛均能取得肯定疗效,但伽玛刀治疗并发症较少且轻,相对更安全;其缺点是起效较慢。
|
| 关 键 词： | 三叉神经痛 放射外科手术 电凝术 |
Comparative study of Gamma knife and radiofrequency thermocoagulation in treatment of trigeminal neuralgia |
| |
| Liu Linghui,Yang Junbao,Xiang Yongsheng,et al. Comparative study of Gamma knife and radiofrequency thermocoagulation in treatment of trigeminal neuralgia[J]. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, 2010, 15(1): 10-12 |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Linghui Yang Junbao Xiang Yongsheng et al |
| |
| Affiliation: | Liu Linghui,Yang Junbao,Xiang Yongsheng,et al. Department of Neurosurgery,First Affiliated Hospital,Jinan University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510630,China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To compare the treatment effects between Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) and radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Methods The treatment outcomes of 131 patients with TN were analyzed retrospectively, 47 out of them underwent GKS treatment and 84 underwent RF treatment. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the pain severity preoperatively and postoperatively. The average preoperative pain scores in GKS group and RF group were 7.89 and 7.95 respectively, no... |
| |
| Keywords: | trigeminal neuralgia radiosurgery electrocoagulation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
