A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvesting technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Purpose

The great saphenous vein harvested with a traditional open technique often results in leg wound complications. An endoscopic harvesting technique may decrease incidence of these complications.

Methods and material

Fifty consecutive patients having elective primary coronary artery bypass surgery were prospectively and randomly assigned to either endoscopic great saphenous vein harvesting (EVH—group A) or open great saphenous vein harvesting (OVH—group B). Both groups were demographically similar and received identical management. Leg wound healing was evaluated at discharge, 1 week, 1 month and 6 months for evidence of complications.

Result

The patient in endoscopic vein harvesting group had increased harvest time and an insignificant increase in vein injuries at the time of harvesting but decreased incision closure times when compared with traditional longitudinal open vein harvesting. Conversion from endoscopy to a traditional longitudinal open vein harvest occurred in 5 % of patients. Leg wound complications were significantly reduced postoperatively in the endoscopic vein harvesting group in comparison with the open vein harvesting group. Histological evaluation of structural integrity of vein samples shows that there is no significant difference between both the groups. No patient was readmitted to the hospital for leg wound complications in either group.

Conclusion

EVH is a safe, reliable method for saphenous vein harvesting. The best indication for EVH may be in patients who are in increased risk for wound infection and in whom cosmetics is a major concern.