首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

合肥市水源水与出厂水中增塑剂污染特征及其水环境健康风险评估
引用本文:单晓梅,黄发源,张兵,汤峰,陆蓓蓓,沈登辉.合肥市水源水与出厂水中增塑剂污染特征及其水环境健康风险评估[J].劳动医学,2013(10):741-747.
作者姓名:单晓梅  黄发源  张兵  汤峰  陆蓓蓓  沈登辉
作者单位:[1]安徽省疾病预防控制中心理化检验科,安徽230601 [2]安徽医科大学公共卫生学院,安徽230032 [3]合肥市供水集团有限公司,安徽230011
基金项目:安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(编号:11040606M216);安徽省预防医学与公共卫生科研项目(编号:2011Y0103)
摘    要:目的]调查合肥市主要水源水与出厂水中邻苯二甲酸酯类(phthalates,PAEs)及己二酸二(乙基己基)酯(DEHA)等增塑剂污染特征,评估其对人体潜在健康风险。方法]分别于平水期、丰水期和枯水期采集巢湖西半湖水、合肥市A、B水厂水源水及其出厂水,水样经固相萃取柱富集后由气相色谱一质谱法(GC/MS)检测PAEs和DEHA;采用美国环境保护署(EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,USEPA)推荐的水环境健康风险评价模型,从饮水途径对致癌和非致癌风险进行定量评估。结果]合肥市水源水与出厂水中均检出5种增塑剂邻苯二甲酸二(2.乙基己基)酯(DEHP)、邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)、邻苯二甲酸二甲酯(DMP)、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP)和己二酸二(乙基己基)酯(DEHA)],但均未超过我国《生活饮用水卫生标准》限值。其中DEHP和DBP为主要污染物,平均贡献率分别为60.22%和21.43%。不同水期增塑剂污染种类未见明显变化,总污染浓度水平呈丰水期〉枯水期〉平水期。巢湖水,A、B水厂水源水及出厂水对人群致癌风险水平为0.80×10-6~2.72×10-6,非致癌风险水平为2.95×10-3~1.04×10-2。致癌和非致癌风险主要来自于DEHP,其贡献率分别为99.0%~99.4%和92.8%~93.8%。结论]合肥市主要水源水及出厂水中可不同程度地检出PAEs和DEHA,初步评价其致癌风险和非致癌风险的风险值均小于美国环境保护署(USEPA)的推荐限值,为可接受水平。

关 键 词:  邻苯二甲酸酯  己二酸酯  风险评估

Pollution Characteristics and Health Risk Assessment of Plasticizers in Source Water and Finished Water in Hefei
SHAN Xiao-mei,HUANG Fa-yuan,ZHANG Bing,TANG Feng,LU Bei-bei,SHEN Deng-hui.Pollution Characteristics and Health Risk Assessment of Plasticizers in Source Water and Finished Water in Hefei[J].Journal of Labour Medicine,2013(10):741-747.
Authors:SHAN Xiao-mei  HUANG Fa-yuan  ZHANG Bing  TANG Feng  LU Bei-bei  SHEN Deng-hui
Institution:1.Physics and Chemistry Lab, Anhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Anhui 230601, China; 2.School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Anhui 230032, China; 3.Hefei Water Supply Group Co. Ltd., Anhui 230011, China)
Abstract: Objective ] To identify health risks to human beings caused by phthalates (PAEs) and di (2-ethyl hexyl) adipate (DEHA) in the source water and finished water in Hefei, China. Methods ] Water samples were collected from the Western Chaohu Lake and two municipal waterworks A and B (including source water and finished water) of Hefei in level, wet, and dry periods. The PAEs and DEHA in water samples were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) combining solid-phase extraction technique, and a health risk assessment model recommended by US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was used to quantitatively evaluate carcinogenic risk and non-carcinogenic risk by the way of drinking. Results ] Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl phthatate (DBP), dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), and DEHA were detected in all collected samples and well within the limits of the National Standards for Drinking Water Quality (GB 5749-2006). Among them, DEHP and DBP were major pollutants, which took 60.22% and 21.43% respectively on average. No obvious differences were found in selected plasticizers across different water periods. The highest total contamination level was found in the wet period, followed by the dry period and the level period. The carcinogenic risk estimated from the water samples was 0.80 × 10-6-2.72 × 10-6, and the non-carcinogenic risk was 2.95 × 10-3-1.04 × 10-2. DEHP was the leading contributor to the calculated carcinogenic and non- carcinogenic risks, accounting for 99.0%-99.4% and 92.8%-93.8% of contributions, respectively. Conclusion ] The source water and finished water in Hefei are polluted by PAEs and DEHA to various degrees of severity; however, the carcinogenic risk and the non-carcinogenic risk are at an acceptable level according to the US EPA's recommended limits.
Keywords:water  phthalates  adipate ester  risk assessment
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号