不同随访方式对留置双J管出院患者影响的效果观察

目的 探讨采用电话、Email、QQ随访方式对留置双J管患者进行出院后健康教育的效果.方法 将319例留置双J管患者随机分为对照组88例电话组89例,Email组70例和QQ组72例,4组患者在住院期间及出院前均进行常规健康教育,出院后由专人分别对电话组、Email组和QQ组患者进行电话、Email、QQ方式的随访,观察患者康复效果.结果 电话组、Email组和QQ组置管期间的并发症明显少于对照组,对置管期间并发症的预防及处理知识的掌握情况显著优于对照组.结论 多种出院随访的方式可供患者根据实际情况来进行选择,由于将医院健康教育延伸到患者家中,减少了各种并发症的发生,取得良好的社会效果,得到了患者及家属的好评.

Abstract：

Objective To explore the effect of health education through different postoperative follow-up method, including telephone、Email and QQ, on patients with indwelling D-J stents. Methods 319patients with indwelling D-J stents were divided into the control group(88 cases), the telephone group(89 cases), the Email group (70 cases) and the QQ group (72 cases). M1 patients received rourine health education during hospitalization and before discharge, the latter three groups received follow-up by telephone、Email and QQ after discharge respectively. The rehabilitation effect was observed in the four groups. Results The complication rates of the telephone group, the Email group and the QQ group was significantly less and the mastering of knowledge about prevention and handling of complication was better than the control group during the follow-up. Conclusions Different types of follow-up can be selected by patients according to their actual status. Decreasing complication rate, favorable social benefit and approval of the patients family members will be seen due to involvement of the patients family in health education.

Observation in effect of different follow-up types on discharged patients with indwelling D-J stents

Objective To explore the effect of health education through different postoperative follow-up method, including telephone、Email and QQ, on patients with indwelling D-J stents. Methods 319patients with indwelling D-J stents were divided into the control group(88 cases), the telephone group(89 cases), the Email group (70 cases) and the QQ group (72 cases). M1 patients received rourine health education during hospitalization and before discharge, the latter three groups received follow-up by telephone、Email and QQ after discharge respectively. The rehabilitation effect was observed in the four groups. Results The complication rates of the telephone group, the Email group and the QQ group was significantly less and the mastering of knowledge about prevention and handling of complication was better than the control group during the follow-up. Conclusions Different types of follow-up can be selected by patients according to their actual status. Decreasing complication rate, favorable social benefit and approval of the patients family members will be seen due to involvement of the patients family in health education.