首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

无透析肾移植与透析后肾移植临床效果的对比研究
引用本文:于立新,叶俊生,杜传福,邓文锋,徐健,付绍杰,王亦斌,刘小友,李川江,苗芸. 无透析肾移植与透析后肾移植临床效果的对比研究[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2004, 25(11): 725-727
作者姓名:于立新  叶俊生  杜传福  邓文锋  徐健  付绍杰  王亦斌  刘小友  李川江  苗芸
作者单位:510515,广州,南方医科大学附属南方医院器官移植科
摘    要:目的 比较透析后肾移植与无透析肾移植的临床效果 ,探讨无透析肾移植的安全性与优越性。 方法 回顾分析 1999年 1月到 2 0 0 3年 1月接受无透析肾移植并定期随访的病例 5 0例 ,选择透析后行肾移植病例 5 0例作为对照 ,2组病例年龄、性别、血型、冷 (热 )缺血时间、人类白细胞抗原 (HLA)配型、原发病、免疫抑制治疗方案等条件相匹配 ,比较 2组病例肾移植术后急、慢性排斥反应和移植肾功能延迟恢复的发生率以及人 /肾存活率。 结果 无透析组中术前曾接受输血者 14例( 2 8% ) ,透析组术前接受输血者 32例 ( 6 4 % ) ,2组比较差异有显著性意义 (P <0 .0 0 1)。无透析组 1年、3年人 /肾存活率均为 10 0 % ,透析组术后 1年、3年人 /肾存活率分别为 10 0 % / 98% ( 5 0 / 4 9)、96 % / 94 % ( 4 8/ 4 7) ,2组比较差异无显著性意义 (P >0 .0 5 )。无透析组术后发生急性排斥反应 3例 ,透析组 5例 ,2组比较差异有显著性意义 (P <0 .0 2 5 ) ;术后发生移植肾功能延迟恢复无透析组为 6例 ,透析组为 12例 ,2组比较差异有显著性意义 (P <0 .0 1)。 结论 无透析肾移植可以减少患者术前透析及输血带来的潜在危险 ,同时能降低术后排斥反应发生率 ,有助于术后移植肾功能的恢复 ,提高移植肾长期存活

关 键 词:无透析肾移植  透析  排斥反应  移植肾功能延迟恢复
修稿时间:2004-07-12

Comparative study on outcomes of pre-emptive renal transplantation and transplantation after dialysis
YU Li-xin,YE Jun-sheng,DU Chuan-fu,et al.. Comparative study on outcomes of pre-emptive renal transplantation and transplantation after dialysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Urology, 2004, 25(11): 725-727
Authors:YU Li-xin  YE Jun-sheng  DU Chuan-fu  et al.
Affiliation:YU Li-xin,YE Jun-sheng,DU Chuan-fu,et al.Center of Organ Transplantation,Nanfang Hospital,Nanfang Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of pre-emptive renal transplantation and transplantation after dialysis, and to evaluate the safety and advantages of pre-emptive renal transplantation. Methods The data of 50 cases of pre-emptive renal transplantation between January 1999 and January 2003 in our hospital were analyzed.Another 50 cases of renal transplantation after dialysis were selected as control group.The 2 groups were matched in the following variables:age,gender,blood type,cold (warm) ischemic time of the grafts,human leukocyte antigen (HLA),primary diseases, and use of immunosuppressants. The patient/allograft survival,incidence of rejection and delayed graft function were compared. Results The control patients (32/50) were more likely to have received blood transfusion before transplantation than patients of pre-emptive renal transplantation (14/50) (64% vs 28%, P <0.001).The 1 and 3 year patient/allograft survival of the 2 groups were similar [100%/100%,100%/100% vs 100%/98%(50/49),96%/94%(48/47),respectively].Acute rejection occurred more frequently in control group (10% vs 6%, P < 0.025 ),and the rate of delayed graft function was also higher in control group compared with patients of pre-emptive renal transplantation(24% vs 12%, P <0.01). Conclusions Pre-emptive renal transplantation can reduce the risk associated with preoperative dialysis and blood transfusion as well as the rate of acute rejection and delayed graft function,favorably influence the early graft function,and improve the long-term survival.
Keywords:pre-emptive renal transplantation  dialysis  acute rejection  delayed graft function
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号