首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

单句询问与中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表在社区50岁以上人群听力筛查中的应用
引用本文:王越,莫玲燕,郑中伟,齐钰,李亚刚,李秀昌,杨杰.单句询问与中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表在社区50岁以上人群听力筛查中的应用[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2016(5):425-429.
作者姓名:王越  莫玲燕  郑中伟  齐钰  李亚刚  李秀昌  杨杰
作者单位:1. 吉林大学第四医院耳聋研究基地 长春 130011;2. 北京和睦家医院耳鼻咽喉科;3. 长春中医药大学药学院数理教研室
基金项目:吉林省卫计委科技项目(2013Z057)
摘    要:目的:探讨中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表(Chinese version of hearing handicap inventory for the eld-erly-screening ,中文版 HHIE-S)和单句询问应用于社区50岁以上人群听力筛查的意义。方法使用中文版HHIE-S 量表及单句询问“您现在觉得听力有问题吗?”两种方法对某社区570例50~85岁中、老年人进行听力筛查,以0.5、1、2、4 kHz 平均纯音听阈(pure-tone audiometry,PTA)作为金标准,分别在 PTA >25、>40、>60 dB HL 三种不同听力损失分级条件下,计算单句询问及中文版 HHIE-S 量表的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值,比较两种方法对不同程度听力损失者的检出能力。结果570例中,PTA>25 dB HL 478例,占83.86%,中文版 HHIE-S 量表>8分者315例,占55.46%,单句询问阳性者299例,占52.46%。在三个不同听力损失分级条件下中文版 HHIE-S 量表>8分的敏感性分别为61%、85%、96%,特异性分别为72%、58%、47%,单句询问阳性组的敏感性为58%、81%、100%,特异性为75%、61%、50%,两种听力筛查方法经统计分析比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论中文版 HHIE-S 量表与单句询问方法对中重度听力损失中、老年人的筛查都有较高的敏感性,可根据研究目的用于临床及基层大样本中、老年人群的听力筛查。

关 键 词:中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表  单句询问  听力筛查

Comparison of the Performance between the Mandarin Version of HHIE-S and Single Question in the Hearing Screening in Old Adults
Abstract:Objective To compare the performance of Mandarin screening version of hearing handicap inven-tory in elderly (HHIE-S)and the single question of hearing loss in the hearing screening in the old adults.Methods A total of 570 participants,aged from 50~85 years,of native Mandarin speakers were tested with standard pure tone audiometry (PTA),HHIE-S and single question"Are you now having difficulty in hearing?".HHIE-S>8 was taken as an indicator of hearing handicap.Sensitivity,specificity,negative predictive values and positive predic-tive values of both HHIE-S and single question inquiry when 0.5~4 kHz PTA average > 25 dB,>40 dB and >60 dB were compared.Results The prevalence was 83.9% (478)measured by PTA.The prevalence was 55.3%and 52.5% for HHIE-S and positive answer for single question,respectively.The sensitivity of HHIE-S when the participants grouped with 0.5~4 kHz PTA average > 25 dB,>40 dB and > 60 dB was 61%,85% and 96%, respectively,whereas the sensitivity of single question of the above 3 conditions was 58%,81% and 100%,respec-tively.The specificity of HHIE-S decreased with greater hearing loss.It was 72%,88% and 47% respectively for HHIE-S and 75%,61% and 50% for the single question.There was no significant difference either for sensitivity and specificity between the HHIE-S and the single question.Conclusion Both the Mandarin version of HHIE-S and single question are effective in the hearing screening of old adults.Depending on the purpose and availability of resources,one or both of them can be adopted.
Keywords:Chinese version of hearing handicap inventory for the elderly-screening  Single questions  Hearing screening
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号