首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Difference in label length between demethylchlortetracycline and oxytetracycline: Implications for the interpretation of bone histomorphometric data
Authors:A M Parfitt  J Foldes  A R Villanueva  M S Shih
Institution:(1) Bone and Mineral Research Laboratory, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd., E& R 7092, 48202 Detroit, MI, USA;(2) Harrington Arthritis Research Center, 1800 E.Van Buren, 85006 Phoenix, AZ, USA
Abstract:Summary We measured the individual lengths of fluorescent labels on the three subdivisions of the endosteal envelope in iliac bone biopsy specimens produced by the administration of both oxytetracycline and demethylchlortetracycline. Fifty-one healthy subjects and 53 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis were labeled in the stated order, and 8 osteopenic patients were labeled in the reverse order. Whatever the order of administration, the demethylchlortetracycline label was longer than the oxytetracycline label. We conclude: (1) the difference in label lengths reflects a difference between the two compounds in some intrinsic property, whether physical, chemical, or pharmacokinetic. (2) If the calculation of extent of mineralizing surface is based on the mean length of the two labels, a suitable correction should be applied to the shorter label; alternatively, the length of the longer label alone should be used. (3) Unlabeled osteoid not due to label escape probably results from slow terminal mineralization after cessation of matrix synthesis during which too few tetracycline molecules are incorporated to exceed the threshold for visible fluorescence, rather than from the temporary interruption of mineralization followed by its resumption.
Keywords:Tetracycline labeling  Bone remodeling  Bone formation rate  Unlabeled osteoid  Bone histomorphometry
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号