首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效比较
引用本文:庞自力,肖传国,曾甫清,骆雨,鲁功成,张齐钧.钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2004,25(10):691-693.
作者姓名:庞自力  肖传国  曾甫清  骆雨  鲁功成  张齐钧
作者单位:430022,华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院泌尿外科
摘    要:目的 比较输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL)治疗输尿管结石的有效性和安全性。 方法 采用输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石 15 9例 16 8侧 ,其中结石直径≥ 1cm者 76侧 ,<1cm者 92侧。ESWL治疗输尿管结石 319例 334侧 ,其中结石直径≥ 1cm者 14 3侧 ,<1cm者 191侧。比较两组手术时间 结石排净率 手术并发症发生率指标的差异。 结果 对直径≥ 1cm和 <1cm的输尿管结石钬激光碎石术治疗平均手术时间分别为 5 8min和 4 3min ,短于ESWL的平均手术时间 6 8min和 5 6min(P <0 .0 1) ;钬激光碎石术对直径≥ 1cm的输尿管结石 3个月结石排净率为 92 % ,高于ESWL的 6 1% (P <0 .0 1) ;对直径 <1cm的输尿管结石钬激光碎石术和ESWL的 3个月结石排净率分别为 95 %和 85 % (P >0 .0 5 )。钬激光碎石术组并发症发生率为 4 .8%( 8/ 16 8) ,ESWL组无明显并发症发生。 结论 输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗直径≥ 1cm的输尿管结石疗效明显优于ESWL ,而直径 <1cm的结石二者疗效差异无显著性 ,ESWL为直径 <1cm结石的首选治疗方法

关 键 词:碎石术  激光    体外冲击波碎石术
修稿时间:2004年1月14日

Treatment of ureteral calculi:comparison between ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
PANG Zi li,XIAO Chuan guo,ZENG Fu qing,et al..Treatment of ureteral calculi:comparison between ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[J].Chinese Journal of Urology,2004,25(10):691-693.
Authors:PANG Zi li  XIAO Chuan guo  ZENG Fu qing  
Institution:PANG Zi li,XIAO Chuan guo,ZENG Fu qing,et al.Department of Urology,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China
Abstract:Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteral calculi. Methods 159 patients (168 sides) underwent ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy,including 76 sides of calculi 1 cm or greater and 92 sides of calculi less than 1 cm in diameter.319 patients (334 sides) underwent ESWL,including 143 sides of calculi 1 cm or greater and 191 sides of calculi less than 1 cm.The operation time,stone free rate and incidence rate of complications were compared between the 2 groups. Results The mean operation time of ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for calculi 1 cm or greater and less than 1 cm was 58 min and 43 min,respectively,which were shorter than 68 min and 56 min with ESWL (both P <0.01). The stone free rate after 3 months in patients with 1 cm or greater stone was 92% for ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy. It was higher than 61% with ESWL ( P <0.01). As for calculi less than 1 cm, the stone free rate with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and ESWL were 95% and 85%,respectively ( P >0.05).The complication rate was 4.8% (8/168) in the group of ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy,while in ESWL group no complication occurred. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for calculi 1 cm or greater in diameter is more effective than ESWL,but no difference between the 2 groups for calculi less than 1 cm.ESWL can be used as the first line therapy for calculi less than 1 cm in diameter.
Keywords:Lithotripsy  laser  Holmium  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号