首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

激光汽化术与前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生疗效的Meta分析
引用本文:张晓波,陈明泉,陈雄,戴元清,齐观南,董超,白耀,谭新骥,谷杰,胡胜,李东杰.激光汽化术与前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生疗效的Meta分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2017,23(7):16-21.
作者姓名:张晓波  陈明泉  陈雄  戴元清  齐观南  董超  白耀  谭新骥  谷杰  胡胜  李东杰
作者单位:(中南大学湘雅医院国际医疗部 外科,湖南 长沙 410008)
基金项目:湖南省自然科学基金(No:14JJ7004)
摘    要:目的系统评价经尿道980nm激光汽化术与前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效。方法收集国内外关于经尿道980nm激光汽化术与TURP治疗BPH的文献,采用Revman5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果筛选后共6篇文献符合纳入标准,总计839例,其中包括980nm激光治疗组450例和TURP组389例。Meta结果显示:和TURP组相比,980nm激光组手术时间差异无统计学意义标准化均数差(SMD)=0.11,95%CI(-0.52,0.74),P0.05],住院时间较短SMD=-1.95,95%CI(-3.42,-0.48),P0.05]及术后尿管留置时间较短SMD=-2.64,95%CI(-3.92,-1.36),P0.05]。980 nm激光组和TURP组在术后国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)差异无统计学意义加权均数差(WMD)=0.12,95%CI(-0.27,0.51),P0.05],术后生活质量评分(QOL)评分差异无统计学意义SMD=0.00,95%CI(-0.57,0.57),P0.05],术后最大尿流率(Qmax)差异无统计学意义SMD=0.06,95%CI(-0.26,0.37),P0.05]。结论 980nm激光治疗良性BPH与经典的TURP术式相比,在住院时间和术后尿管留置时间方面有优势,远期效果无明显差异。

关 键 词:良性前列腺增生  经尿道980nm激光汽化术  经尿道前列腺电切术
收稿时间:2017/4/6 0:00:00

Diode laser vaporization of prostate versus transurethral resesction of prostate in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Meta-analysis*
Xiao-bo Zhang,Ming-quan Chen,Xiong Chen,Yuan-qing Dai,Guan-nan Qi,Chao Dong,Yao Bai,Xin-ji Tan,Jie Gu,Sheng Hu,Dong-jie Li.Diode laser vaporization of prostate versus transurethral resesction of prostate in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Meta-analysis*[J].China Journal of Endoscopy,2017,23(7):16-21.
Authors:Xiao-bo Zhang  Ming-quan Chen  Xiong Chen  Yuan-qing Dai  Guan-nan Qi  Chao Dong  Yao Bai  Xin-ji Tan  Jie Gu  Sheng Hu  Dong-jie Li
Affiliation:(Department of Geriatrics, Xiangya International Medical Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China)
Abstract:Objective?To systematically review and evaluate the perioperative indicators and surgical curative effect of 980 nm diode laser vaporization of prostate and transurethral resesction of prostate (TURP) in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).?Methods?Retrieved published comparative studies 980 nm diode laser vaporization of prostate versus transurethral resesction of prostate in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, and pooled the data from eligible studies. The statistical analysis was performed using Revman 5.3 software.?Results?Six trials including 839 patients were eligible to the criteria (450 in 980 nm diode laser group and 389 in TURP group). The baseline of patients characteristics were comparable in all the studies. Meta analysis showed that: the operative time was not significantly different between the 980 nm diode laser group and TURP group SMD = 0.11, 95 ~ CI (-0.52, 0.74), P > 0.05]; Compared with TURP group, 980 nm diode laser group has shorter hospital stays SMD = -1.95, 95%CI (-3.42, -0.48), P < 0.05], and shorter catheterization time SMD = -2.64, 95%CI (-3.92, -1.36), P < 0.05]. There was no significant difference between IPSS WMD = 0.12, 95%CI (-0.27, 0.51), P > 0.05], QOL SMD = 0.00, 95%CI (-0.57, 0.57), P > 0.05] and Qmax SMD = 0.06, 95%CI (-0.26, 0.37), P > 0.05].?Conclusion?980 nm diode laser vaporization of prostate is safe and effective in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, and compared with TURP, it has advantages in shorter hospital stays and shorter catheterization time.
Keywords:benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH)  980 nm diode laser vaporization of prostate  transurethral resesction of prostate (TURP)
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国内镜杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国内镜杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号