首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Differential effects of bifrontal tDCS on arousal and sleep duration in insomnia patients and healthy controls
Authors:Lukas Frase  Peter Selhausen  Lukas Krone  Sulamith Tsodor  Friederike Jahn  Bernd Feige  Jonathan G. Maier  Florian Mainberger  Hannah Piosczyk  Marion Kuhn  Stefan Klöppel  Annette Sterr  Chiara Baglioni  Kai Spiegelhalder  Dieter Riemann  Michael A. Nitsche  Christoph Nissen
Affiliation:1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany;2. University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bern, Switzerland;3. Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, UK;4. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany;5. Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany;6. Department of Neurology, University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany;7. University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bern, Switzerland;8. Center for NeuroModulation, Faculty of Medciine, University of Freiburg, Germany
Abstract:

Background

Arousal and sleep represent basic domains of behavior, and alterations are of high clinical importance.

Objective/hypothesis

The aim of this study was to further elucidate the neurobiology of insomnia disorder (ID) and the potential for new treatment developments, based on the modulation of cortical activity through the non-invasive brain stimulation technique transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Specifically, we tested the hypotheses that bi-frontal anodal tDCS shortens and cathodal tDCS prolongs total sleep time in patients with ID, compared to sham stimulation. Furthermore, we tested for differences in indices of arousal between ID patients and healthy controls and explored their potential impact on tDCS effects.

Methods

Nineteen ID patients underwent a within-subject repeated-measures sleep laboratory study with adaptation, baseline and three experimental nights. Bifrontal anodal, cathodal and sham tDCS was delivered in a counterbalanced order immediately prior to sleep. Wake EEG was recorded prior to and after tDCS as well as on the following morning. Subsequently, we compared patients with ID to a healthy control group from an earlier dataset.

Results

Against our hypothesis, we did not observe any tDCS effects on sleep continuity or sleep architecture in patients with ID. Further analyses of nights without stimulation demonstrated significantly increased levels of arousal in ID patients compared to healthy controls, as indexed by subjective reports, reduced total sleep time, increased wake after sleep onset and increased high frequency EEG power during wakefulness and NREM sleep. Of note, indices of increased arousal predicted the lack of effect of tDCS in ID patients.

Conclusions

Our study characterizes for the first time differential effects of tDCS on sleep in patients with ID and healthy controls, presumably related to persistent hyperarousal in ID. These findings suggest that adapted tDCS protocols need to be developed to modulate arousal and sleep dependent on baseline arousal levels.
Keywords:Non-invasive  Brain stimulation  Hyperarousal  Electrosleep  EEG
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号