首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Nurses’ clinical reasoning concerning management of peripheral venous cannulae
Authors:Maria Eiman Johansson  Ewa Pilhammar  Ania Willman
Institution:1. Authors: Maria Eiman Johansson, BNSc, RN, Doctoral student, Faculty of Health and Society, Malm? University, Malm?;2. Ewa Pilhammar, PhD, RN, Professor, Institute of Health Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at G?teborg University, G?teborg;3. Faculty of Health and Society, Malm? University, Malm?;4. Ania Willman, PhD, RN, Senior Lecturer, School of Health Science, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden
Abstract:Aim. The aim was to describe nurses’ clinical reasoning regarding peripheral venous cannulae management by focusing on the clinical information and circumstances considered during the decision‐making process. Background. On every shift nurses make several decisions, among others concerning the management of peripheral venous cannulae. Thrombophlebitis is a common complication associated with its use, although more severe complications can arise. There are clinical practice guidelines within the area, but they are not always adhered to. Previous studies have examined decisions related to the management of peripheral venous cannulae, but did not include observations in a naturalistic setting. Design. A qualitative study combining observations and interviews. Methods. Participant observation facilitated open interviews about the clinical reasoning behind decision‐making in observed situations, as well as semi‐structured interviews regarding clinical reasoning about the general management of peripheral venous cannulae. Transcribed interview texts were analysed with content analysis. Results. Three main categories describe clinical information and circumstances: the individual patient situation, the nurse’s work situation and experience of peripheral venous cannulae management. The overall theme of the interview texts was that the clinical reasoning was a balancing act between minimising patient discomfort and preventing complications from the peripheral venous cannulae. Conclusions. At all times the patients’ well‐being was considered, but the ways the nurses approached this differed depending on how they considered clinical information in the individual patient situation, circumstances in their own work situation and their experience of peripheral venous cannulae management. Relevance to clinical practice. Knowledge of the clinical information and circumstances considered in naturalistic settings, is valuable when implementing and adjusting clinical practice guidelines to local settings. This knowledge is also useful in nursing education as student nurses’ and nurses’ ability to balance between preventing complications and avoiding discomfort is important for enhancing patient care.
Keywords:cannulation  clinical reasoning  decision‐making  nurses  nursing
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号