首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Foot burns: A comparative analysis of diabetic and non-diabetic patients
Authors:Jason Diab  Justine O’Hara  Miranda Pye  Christine Parker  Peter KM Maitz  Andrea Issler-Fisher
Institution:1. Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Burns Unit, Australia;2. ANZAC Research Institute, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia;3. Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;4. School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
Abstract:IntroductionFoot burns represent a small part of the body with many challenges. The impact of diabetes on clinical outcomes adds further issues in management that clinicians must consider in their management. These factors have serious implications on morbidity and long term sequelae. Our aim is to analyse epidemiological trends of foot burns and examine the differences between diabetic and non-diabetics at Concord hospital from 2014 to 2019.MethodsA retrospective audit from 2014–19 at Concord General Repatriation Hospital Burns Unit summarised patient demographics, burn injury, diabetic status, operations and length of stay. All foot burn injuries from 2014–19 of all ages and gender that attended Concord burns hospital were included in this study.ResultsWe treated 797 patients who presented with foot burns, of which 16.2% were diabetic. The average age was higher in diabetics (60.72 years) than non-diabetics (39.72 years) and more males suffered burns compared to females in both groups (p < 0.001). There was a larger portion of elderly patients (greater than 65 years old, 15.1% of total) who sustained foot burns in the diabetic group compared to the non-diabetic group (p < 0.001). The most affected season was summer (27.0%), but diabetic patients were 1.7 times more likely to sustain injury in winter than non-diabetics. Diabetics were 3.8 times more likely to have contact burns compared to non-diabetic patients (p < 0.001). In a multivariable linear regression analysis, factors that contributed to increased length of stay included elderly status, place of event, diabetic status, number of operations, ICU admission, wound infection, amputation, and admission F (16, 757 = 41.149, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.465].ConclusionsWith the increase of diabetes, our multidisciplinary approach to diabetic foot care should include nursing, medical and surgical disciplines to identify patients at risk. The data highlights that a focus on prevention and education for diabetes is central to optimize glycaemic control and burn management, whilst providing a multidisciplinary network on discharge.
Keywords:Foot burns  Diabetes  Seasons  Diabetic foot  Length of stay  Multidisciplinary care
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号