Estimation of pulse pressure variation and cardiac output in patients having major abdominal surgery: a comparison between a mobile application for snapshot pulse wave analysis and invasive pulse wave analysis

Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and cardiac output (CO) can guide perioperative fluid management. Capstesia (Galenic App, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain) is a mobile application for snapshot pulse wave analysis (PWAsnap) and estimates PPV and CO using pulse wave analysis of a snapshot of the arterial blood pressure waveform displayed on any patient monitor. We evaluated the PPV and CO measurement performance of PWAsnap in adults having major abdominal surgery. In a prospective study, we simultaneously measured PPV and CO using PWAsnap installed on a tablet computer (PPV_PWAsnap, CO_PWAsnap) and using invasive internally calibrated pulse wave analysis (ProAQT; Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany; PPV_ProAQT, CO_ProAQT). We determined the diagnostic accuracy of PPV_PWAsnap in comparison to PPV_ProAQT according to three predefined PPV categories and by computing Cohen’s kappa coefficient. We compared CO_ProAQT and CO_PWAsnap using Bland-Altman analysis, the percentage error, and four quadrant plot/concordance rate analysis to determine trending ability. We analyzed 190 paired PPV and CO measurements from 38 patients. The overall diagnostic agreement between PPV_PWAsnap and PPV_ProAQT across the three predefined PPV categories was 64.7% with a Cohen’s kappa coefficient of 0.45. The mean (±?standard deviation) of the differences between CO_PWAsnap and CO_ProAQT was 0.6?±?1.3 L min^??1 (95% limits of agreement 3.1 to ??1.9 L min^??1) with a percentage error of 48.7% and a concordance rate of 45.1%. In adults having major abdominal surgery, PPV_PWAsnap moderately agrees with PPV_ProAQT. The absolute and trending agreement between CO_PWAsnap with CO_ProAQT is poor. Technical improvements are needed before PWAsnap can be recommended for hemodynamic monitoring.