首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

机构结构化教育联合家庭康复训练治疗儿童孤独症的疗效观察
引用本文:刘超,卢斌,张瑜,徐传国,彭凤翔,马丽芳,刘丽莉,聂文英.机构结构化教育联合家庭康复训练治疗儿童孤独症的疗效观察[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2015,17(12):1277-1281.
作者姓名:刘超  卢斌  张瑜  徐传国  彭凤翔  马丽芳  刘丽莉  聂文英
作者单位:刘超, 卢斌, 张瑜, 徐传国, 彭凤翔, 马丽芳, 刘丽莉, 聂文英
摘    要:目的探讨机构结构化教育联合家庭康复训练模式治疗儿童孤独症的疗效。方法选取100例孤独症儿童,随机分为联合治疗组(n=50)和对照组(n=50)。对照组给予机构结构化教育,联合治疗组给予机构结构化教育联合家庭康复训练。比较两组孤独症儿童行为检查量表(ABC)评分、孤独症治疗评估量表(ATEC)评分、中文版儿童孤独症及相关发育障碍心理教育评定量表(C-PEP)评分。结果训练12个月后,联合治疗组患儿ABC各维度评分及总分均显著低于对照组(PPP结论机构结构化教育联合家庭康复训练是儿童孤独症的有效治疗模式,值得临床推广应用。

关 键 词:结构化教育  家庭康复训练  孤独症  儿童  
收稿时间:2015/8/8 0:00:00
修稿时间:2015/9/22 0:00:00

Clinical efficacy of structured institution-based teaching programme combined with family rehabilitation training in treatment of childhood autism
LIU Chao,LU Bin,ZHANG Yu,XU Chuan-Guo,PENG Feng-Xiang,MA Li-Fang,LIU Li-Li,NIE Wen-Ying.Clinical efficacy of structured institution-based teaching programme combined with family rehabilitation training in treatment of childhood autism[J].Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics,2015,17(12):1277-1281.
Authors:LIU Chao  LU Bin  ZHANG Yu  XU Chuan-Guo  PENG Feng-Xiang  MA Li-Fang  LIU Li-Li  NIE Wen-Ying
Institution:LIU Chao, LU Bin, ZHANG Yu, XU Chuan-Guo, PENG Feng-Xiang, MA Li-Fang, LIU Li-Li, NIE Wen-Ying
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of a structured institution-based teaching programme combined with family rehabilitation training in the treatment of childhood autism. Methods One hundred children with autism were divided into a combination therapy group (n=50) and a control group (n=50). The children in the control group received a structured institution-based teaching programme, and the children in the combination therapy group received a family rehabilitation training besides the structured institution-based teaching programme. Comparisons were made between the two groups by the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) score, Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) score, and Chinese version of Psychoeducational Profile (C-PEP) sore. Results After 12-months training, each dimension score and total score of ABC in the combination therapy group were all significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The combination therapy group had significantly lower dimension scores and total score of ATEC than the control group (P<0.05). Each dimension score and total score of C-PEP were significantly higher in the combination therapy than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions As an effective treatment mode for childhood autism, structured institution-based teaching programme combined with family rehabilitation training is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
Keywords:Structured teaching|Family rehabilitation training|Autism|Child
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国当代儿科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国当代儿科杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号