首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Traditional landmark versus ultrasound guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial
Authors:Máté Rudas  Ian Seppelt  Robert Herkes  Robert Hislop  Dorrilyn Rajbhandari  Leonie Weisbrodt
Institution:.Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Intensive Care Services Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050 Sydney, Australia ;.Nepean Hospital, Intensive Care Unit Derby St, Penrith, NSW 2750 Sydney, Australia ;.Sydney Nursing School - The University of Sydney 88 Mallett St, Camperdown, NSW 2050 Sydney, Australia ;.The George Institute for Global Health Level 13, 321 Kent St, NSW 2000 Sydney, Australia ;.Australian School of Advanced Medicine 2 Technology Place, Macquarie University, NSW 2109 Sydney, Australia
Abstract:

Introduction

Long-term ventilated intensive care patients frequently require tracheostomy. Although overall risks are low, serious immediate and late complications still arise. Real-time ultrasound guidance has been proposed to decrease complications and improve the accuracy of the tracheal puncture. We aimed to compare the procedural safety and efficacy of real-time ultrasound guidance with the traditional landmark approach during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT).

Methods

A total of 50 patients undergoing PDT for clinical indications were randomly assigned, after obtaining informed consent, to have the tracheal puncture procedure carried out using either traditional anatomical landmarks or real-time ultrasound guidance. Puncture position was recorded via bronchoscopy. Blinded assessors determined in a standardised fashion the deviation of the puncture off midline and whether appropriate longitudinal position between the first and fourth tracheal rings was achieved. Procedural safety and efficacy data, including complications and number of puncture attempts required, were collected.

Results

In total, 47 data sets were evaluable. Real-time ultrasound guidance resulted in significantly more accurate tracheal puncture. Mean deviation from midline was 15 ± 3° versus 35 ± 5° (P = 0.001). The proportion of appropriate punctures, defined a priori as 0 ± 30° from midline, was significantly higher: 20 (87%) of 23 versus 12 (50%) of 24 (RR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.67; P = 0.006). First-pass success rate was 20 (87%) of 23 in the ultrasound group and 14 (58%) of 24 in the landmark group (RR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.17; P = 0.028). The observed decrease in procedural complications was not statistically significant: 5 (22%) of 23 in the ultrasound group versus 9 (37%) of 24 in the landmark group (RR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.23 to 1.47; P = 0.24).

Conclusions

Ultrasound guidance significantly improved the rate of first-pass puncture and puncture accuracy. Fewer procedural complications were observed; however, this did not reach statistical significance. These results support wider general use of real-time ultrasound guidance as an additional tool to improve PDT.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID: ACTRN12611000237987 (registered 4 March 2011)

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0514-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号