首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

舒他西林、氧氟沙星、氯霉素治疗伤寒128例疗效观察
引用本文:肖明英. 舒他西林、氧氟沙星、氯霉素治疗伤寒128例疗效观察[J]. 大理医学院学报, 1999, 0(3)
作者姓名:肖明英
作者单位:大理医学院保山教学医院内五科
摘    要:目的:评价三种抗菌素治疗伤寒的安全性和有效性。方法:将128例伤寒患者随机分为三组,分别予舒他西林3g静滴,1次/日;氧氟沙星200mg静滴,1次/日;氯霉素1g静滴,1次/日。结果:总有效率舒他西林组为978%,氧氟沙星组为929%,氯霉素组为80%。组间比较,舒他西林组与氯霉素组间有显著差异性,P<001。余两组间差异无显著性。副作用发生率:舒他西林组为43%,氧氟沙星组为143%,氯霉素组为75%。结论:舒他西林治疗伤寒疗效最好而副作用最少,可做为治疗伤寒的首选药物。

关 键 词:伤寒;氧氟沙星;舒他西林;氯霉素

A Comparative Study in the Treatment of 128 cases of Typhoid Feverwith Sulbactam-Ampicillin,Ofloxacin and Chloramphenicol
Xiao Minying. A Comparative Study in the Treatment of 128 cases of Typhoid Feverwith Sulbactam-Ampicillin,Ofloxacin and Chloramphenicol[J]. Journal of Dali Medical College, 1999, 0(3)
Authors:Xiao Minying
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of the three antibiotics in the treatment of typhoid fever.Methods:128 cases of patients with typhoid fever in the hospital were divided randomly into three groups.They were given 3g of Sulbactam-Ampicillin, 200mg of Ofloxacin and lg of Chloramphenicol by intravenous injection every day,respectively.Results:The effective rates of the drugs were 978%, 929% and 80% respectively.There is a significant difference between the Sulbactam-Ampicillin group and Chloramphenicol group in effective rates(P<001) and there is no marked difference between the other two groups(P>005). Their side-effect incidences are 43%, 143% and 75% respectively. Conclusion:It suggests that Sulbactam-Ampicillin has the best effect and safety in the three antibiotics in the treatment of typhoid fever and it can be used as the first selected drug in the treatment of typhoid fever.
Keywords:Typhoid fever  Sulbactam-Ampicillin  Ofloxacin  Chloramphenicol
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号