双能量CT肺灌注及血管成像与核素肺通气灌注成像诊断肺栓塞的对照研究

目的 通过与核素肺通气灌注显像比较,评价双能量CT肺血管成像(DE-CTPA)及双能量CT肺灌注成像(DE-CTLP)技术诊断肺栓塞的能力.方法 比较50例临床怀疑肺栓塞的患者DE-CTPA、DE-CTLP及核素肺通气灌注显像结果,以非线性相关检验比较DE-CTPA显示肺血管腔内充盈缺损与DE-CTLP显示灌注缺损之间的相关性,以核素为参考标准,应用一致性检验方法(Kappa检验)对照分析两者之间的一致性及DE-CTLP诊断肺栓塞的敏感性和特异性.结果 (1)50例临床怀疑肺栓塞患者中,4例CT图像质量差,不能评价.余46例共920个有效肺段中,DE-CTPA显示262个肺段肺血管腔内充盈缺损,DE-CTLP显示266个肺段明确灌注缺损.核素肺通气灌注扫描显示268个肺段灌注与通气不匹配.(2)DE-CTLP与DE-CTPA两者间显著相关(r=0.883,P<0.01);DE-CTLP与核素肺通气灌注显像的一致性良好(Kappa=0.940,P<0.01);以核素肺通气灌注成像为诊断参考标准,应用DE-CTLP诊断肺栓塞的阳性预测值95.5%(279/292),阴性预测值98.3%(641/652),敏感性96.2%(279/290),特异性98.0%(641/654).(3)应用CareDose 4D技术,DE-CTPA和DE-CTLP患者平均射线损伤剂量为(4.37±0.47)mSv.结论 应用DE-CTPA和DE-CTLP技术可以在一次扫描中同时获得常规CT肺血管成像的血管形态学信息和肺实质血流灌注情况,为临床诊断肺栓塞提供直观、有效的综合影像信息.

Comparative study of dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography and lung perfusion with pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography (DE-CTPA) and dual-energy CT lung perfusion (DE-CTLP) in the assessment of pulmonary embolism comparing with pulmonary ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Methods Fifty patients suspected of PE (26 males, 24 females) underwent both DE-CTPA, DE-CTLP and pulmonary ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. The results were compared and the correlation between the intravascular clots in DE-CTPA and the perfusion defects in DE-CTLP was analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of DE-CTLP for PE were assessed according to scintigraphic results which was considered as a "gold" standard. Result ( 1 ) Of 50 cases,920 segments in 46 cases were diagnostable, 4 cases were not included because of the poor image quality. lntravascular clots were found in 262 segments on DE-CTPA and perfusion defects in 266 segments were identified on DE-CTLP, while 268 segments were positive on scintigraphy. (2) The perfusion defects on DE-CTLP were correlated well with the clots on CTPA ( r = 0. 883, P < 0. 01 ). The Dual energy CT Lung perfusion imaging had a good consistence with scintigraphy (Kappa = 0. 940, P <0. 01 ). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were 96. 2% (279/290), 98.0%(641/654), 95. 5% (279/292) and 98. 3% (641/652), respectively. (3)The radiation dose of DE-CTPA and CE-CTLP scan was(4. 37 ± 0. 47) mSv by using CareDose 4D technique. Conclusion DE-CTPA and CE-CTLP can provide pulmonary vascular morphology and parenchyma perfusion information which are useful and valuable for the diagnosis of PE.