Fecoflowmetric Analysis of Anorectal Motor Function in Postoperative Anal-Preserving Surgery Patients With Low Rectal Cancer Comparison With the Wexner Score and Anorectal Manometry

The aim of this study was to elucidate whether fecoflowmetry (FFM) could evaluate more detailed evacuative function than anorectal manometry by comparing between FFM or anorectal manometric findings and the clinical questionnaires and the types of surgical procedure in the patients who received anal-preserving surgery. Fifty-three patients who underwent anal-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer were enrolled. The relationships between FFM or the manometric findings and the clinical questionnaires and the types of procedure of anal-preserving surgery were evaluated. There were significant differences between FFM markers and the clinical questionnaire and the types of the surgical procedure, whereas no significant relationship was observed between the manometric findings and the clinical questionnaire and the types of the surgical procedure. FFM might be feasible and useful for the objective assessment of evacuative function and may be superior to manometry for patients undergoing anal-preserving surgery.Key words: Anorectal manometry, Anal-preserving surgery, Fecoflowmetry, Incontinence, Rectal cancerSphincter preservation has been one of the key issues of rectal cancer surgery. Low anterior resection (LAR)¹ and internal and external sphincter resection (ISR and ESR) are anal-preserving surgeries.^2,3 The aim of these procedures is to restore the normal process of defecation, along with its function, and to improve the quality of life of patients by avoiding permanent colostomy. However, anal-preserving surgery is often associated with evacuative dysfunction and various degrees of incontinence.^4–7Most studies that have assessed the evacuation function have used clinical questionnaires, which are subjective and may vary according to the patient perception.⁷ There are many factors that can affect the evacuative function, such as the stool consistency, rectal capacity, anal sphincters, pelvic floor muscles, and intra-abdominal pressure. Although manometry with or without the clinical score has also commonly been used, fecoflowmetry (FFM) has been reported to be more accurate and useful for assessing the postoperative anorectal motor function.^8–13 FFM was first introduced by Shafik and is a dynamic method for examining the anorectal motor activity that simulates the natural act of defecation.¹⁴ Some studies have shown its usefulness in postoperative patients with anorectal disease,^8–11 but only a few studies have been performed to examine the evacuative function following anal-preserving surgery.^12,13 The aim of this study was to evaluate the evacuative function in the postoperative period following anal-preserving surgery in patients with low rectal cancer using FFM, and to compare the results with the Wexner score and anorectal manometry.¹⁵