首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

FLAG和MEA方案治疗难治复发性急性髓系白血病的Meta分析
引用本文:刘祥祥,张 涛,王健红,张 娜,郝彩霞,鲁英娟,郭华燕,段晓晖,梁 蓉.FLAG和MEA方案治疗难治复发性急性髓系白血病的Meta分析[J].现代肿瘤医学,2019,0(4):636-640.
作者姓名:刘祥祥  张 涛  王健红  张 娜  郝彩霞  鲁英娟  郭华燕  段晓晖  梁 蓉
作者单位:空军军医大学西京医院血液科,陕西 西安 710032
摘    要:目的:系统评价氟达拉滨+阿糖胞苷+重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(FLAG)和米托蒽醌+依托泊苷+阿糖胞苷(MEA)方案治疗难治复发性急性髓系白血病(RRAML)的疗效及不良反应。方法:计算机检索Pub Med、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、VIP、Wan Fang Data、CNKI、CBM等数据库发表的关于FLAG和MEA方案治疗RRAML的随机对照试验(RCT)。由两位研究者独立进行文献筛选、资料提取和质量评价后,采用Rev Man 5. 0软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入6个研究,299例患者。Meta分析结果显示:FLAG方案和MEA方案治疗RRAML时,两者的CRRR=1. 49,95%CI(0. 92,2. 43),P=0. 11]及PRRR=1. 38,95%CI(0. 82,2. 32),P=0. 23]无明显差异,但FLAG方案治疗组的总有效率高于MEA方案治疗组,两组的差异有统计学意义RR=1. 98,95%CI(1. 21,3. 24),P=0. 006],其真菌感染率亦高于MEA组,两组的差异有统计学意义RR=2. 17,95%CI(1. 09,4. 31),P=0. 03]。结论:FLAG方案治疗RRAML的总有效率高于MEA方案,但其真菌感染率亦高。受纳入研究的数量及质量限制,本系统评价结论仍需进一步开展更多大样本、严格设计的随机对照试验加以验证。

关 键 词:FLAG  MEA  难治复发性急性髓系白血病  META分析  系统评价  随机对照试验

Effectiveness of FLAG regimen and MEA regimen for refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia:A Meta-analysis
Liu Xiangxiang,Zhang Tao,Wang Jianhong,Zhang Na,Hao Caixia,Lu Yingjuan,Guo Huayan,Duan Xiaohui,Liang Rong.Effectiveness of FLAG regimen and MEA regimen for refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia:A Meta-analysis[J].Journal of Modern Oncology,2019,0(4):636-640.
Authors:Liu Xiangxiang  Zhang Tao  Wang Jianhong  Zhang Na  Hao Caixia  Lu Yingjuan  Guo Huayan  Duan Xiaohui  Liang Rong
Institution:Department of Hematology,Xijing Hospital,the Air Force Military Medical University,Shaanxi Xi'an 710032,China.
Abstract:Objective:To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and adverse reaction of FLAG and MEA in the treatment of refractory and relapse acute myeloid leukemia(RRAML).Methods:Such databases as PubMed,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,VIP,WanFang Data,CNKI,CBM were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials(RCTs) on FLAG and MEA in treating refractory and relapse acute myeloid leukemia.Document selection and data fetch and the quality of included studies was evaluated by two reviewers in-dependently,and then Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.0 software.Results:A total of six studies involving 299 patients were included.Results of Meta-analyses showed that when FLAG and MEA were used in the treatment of refractory and relapse acute myeloid leukemia,significant differences were found in the total effective rate (RR=1.98,95%CI:1.21 to 3.24,P=0.006),but no significant difference was found in complete remission (RR=1.49,95%CI:0.92 to 2.43,P=0.11) and partial remission (RR=1.38,95%CI:0.82 to 2.32,P=0.23).And the fungal infection rate after treatment were also significant differences (RR=2.17,95%CI:1.09 to 4.31,P=0.03).Conclusion:In the total effective rate of treatment for refractory and relapse acute myeloid leukemia,the FLAG regimen is superior to MEA regimen,but the fungal infection rate was also higher.However,all these findings should be further confirmed with more large sample and well-designed RCTs.
Keywords:FLAG  MEA  refractory and relapse acute myeloid leukemia(RRAML)  Meta-analysis  systematic review  randomized controlled trial
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《现代肿瘤医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代肿瘤医学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号