首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种不同内固定植入物治疗髌骨骨折的疗效比较
引用本文:金斌麟. 两种不同内固定植入物治疗髌骨骨折的疗效比较[J]. 安徽卫生职业技术学院学报, 2013, 12(4): 64-65
作者姓名:金斌麟
作者单位:金斌麟(东至县官港镇中心卫生院骨伤科,安徽,247200);
摘    要:目的:探讨髌骨骨折的两种手术内固定治疗方法的疗效。方法:对22例不同类型髌骨骨折随机采用改良AO克氏针钢丝张力带、形状记忆合金髌骨爪两种不同内固定方法取得的疗效。结果:随访6—18个月,平均12个月。改良AO克氏针钢丝张力带内固定组优8例,良1例,差1例,优良率90%;形状记忆合金髌骨爪组优10例,良1例,差1例,优良率91.66%。结论:形状记忆合金髌骨爪治疗髌骨骨折疗效可靠,并发症较低,操作简单。

关 键 词:髌骨骨折  记忆合金髌骨爪  张力带

Comparisons of Two Inserts of Internal Fixation in Treating patella Fractures
Affiliation:Department of surgery of Guangang town center hospital, Dongzhi 247290, Anhui JIN Bin-lin
Abstract:Objective :To investigate the different effect of two surgical internal fixation treatments for ture. Methods:A consecutive series of 22 patients with different types of using tension band technique for 10 patients and memory alloy surgery and follow-up ,we evaluated surgery effect according to was 6 ~ 18 months, 12 months in average.In the tension band patellar patellar patella frac- fracture were included in the study concentrator for 12 patients in random. After Lu-Yupu scoring system. Results:The follow-up time technique group, 8 were evaluated as excellent, 1 as good,1 as poor, the rate of excellent and good results was 90%. In the memory alloy patellar concentrator group, lOwere evaluated as excellent, 1 as good,1 as poor the rate of excellent and good results was 91.66%. Conclusion: The memory alloy patellar concentrator fixation is an effective treatment for pateUar fracture with less complications andeasier operations.
Keywords:Patellar fracture  Memory alloy patellar concentrator  Tension band
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号