Pharmacist driven antibiotic redosing in the emergency department |
| |
Affiliation: | 3. Department of Pharmacy Services, Amita Health Resurrection Medical Center Chicago, 7435 W Talcott Ave, Chicago, IL 60631, USA;1. Gill Heart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States of America;2. College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States of America;3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States of America;1. Division of Clinical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, VCU Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States of America;2. Virginia Poison Center, Richmond, VA, United States of America;3. Department of Emergency Medicine, VCU Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States of America;4. Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America;5. School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America;1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China;2. Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom;3. Hepato-pancreato-biliary Center, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China;4. Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China |
| |
Abstract: | Study objectiveDetermine whether an expanded emergency medicine (EM) pharmacist scope of practice reduces the frequency of major delays in subsequent antibiotic administration in patients boarded in the emergency department (ED).MethodsA pre-post, quasi-experimental study conducted from November 2019–March 2020 at a single-center tertiary academic medical center following the implementation of an expanded EM pharmacist scope of practice. Adult patients were included if they received an initial antibiotic dose in the ED and deemed to be high-risk. Subsequent antibiotic doses were reordered by EM pharmacists for up to 24-h after the initial order pending ED length of stay (LOS). The historical control group consisted of retrospective chart review of cases from the previous year.ResultsThe study identified that of the 181 participants enrolled, major delays in subsequent antibiotic administration occurred in 13% of the intervention group and 48% of the control group (p < 0.01). When compared to the control group, the intervention group had a significant decrease in the number of delays among antibiotics dosed at 6-h (39% vs 13%) and 8-h (60% vs 8%) intervals. For antibiotics dosed at 12-h intervals, no statistically significant difference was observed between the control and intervention groups respectively (19% vs 5%). A statistically significant lower incidence of in-hospital mortality was observed in the intervention group (3% vs 11%, p = 0.02). In the intervention group, 97% of patients received subsequent antibiotic doses while boarded in the ED, compared to 65% in the control group (<0.01).ConclusionExpanding EM pharmacist scope of practice was associated with a significant reduction in the frequency of major delays in subsequent antibiotic administration as well as a decreased incidence of hospital mortality. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|