首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Factor structure of the Q-LES-Q short form in an enrolled mental health clinic population
Authors:Rachel P Riendeau  Jennifer L Sullivan  Mark Meterko  Kelly Stolzmann  Alicia K Williamson  Christopher J Miller  Bo Kim  Mark S Bauer
Institution:1.Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR),VA Boston Healthcare System (152M),Boston,USA;2.Department of Health Law, Policy and Management,Boston University School of Public Health,Boston,USA;3.Department of Psychiatry,Harvard Medical School,Boston,USA;4.Department of Anthropology,University of Iowa,Iowa City,USA;5.School of Information,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,USA
Abstract:

Purpose

The Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a recovery-oriented, self-report measure with an uncertain underlying factor structure, variously reported in the literature to consist of either one or two domains. We examined the possible factor structures of the English version in an enrolled mental health population who were not necessarily actively engaged in care.

Methods

As part of an implementation trial in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs mental health clinics, we administered the Q-LES-Q-SF and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) over the phone to 576 patients across nine medical centers. We used a split-sample approach and conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and multi-trait analysis (MTA). Comparison with VR-12 assessed construct validity.

Results

Based on 568 surveys after excluding the work satisfaction item due to high unemployment rate, the EFA indicated a unidimensional structure. The MTA showed a single factor: ten items loaded on one strong psychosocial factor (α?=?0.87). Only three items loaded on a physical factor (α?=?0.63). Item discriminant validity was strong at 92.3%. Correlations with the VR-12 were consistent with the existence of two factors.

Conclusions

The English version of the Q-LES-Q-SF is a valid, reliable self-report instrument for assessing quality of life. Its factor structure can be best described as one strong psychosocial factor. Differences in underlying factor structure across studies may be due to limitations in using EFA on Likert scales, language, culture, locus of participant recruitment, disease burden, and mode of administration.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号