首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

改良阴式子宫切除术120例临床分析
引用本文:徐莉辉. 改良阴式子宫切除术120例临床分析[J]. 按摩与康复医学, 2012, 0(26): 27-28
作者姓名:徐莉辉
作者单位:湖南长沙建设医院,长沙410007
摘    要:目的:分析改良阴式子宫切除术在子宫良性病变的临床应用效果.方法:对2005年5月-2008年12月在我院120例行改良阴式子宫切除术(改良组)与30例行传统阴式子宫切除术(对照组)的临床资料进行回顾性分析.结果:改良组术中出血量、手术时间、肛门排气时间、术后恢复、住院时间及术后病率,均明显少于传统组(P〈0.05).改良组子宫大小平均为(403.5±78.2g),传统组为(71.4±22.4g),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01),但术后疼痛用止痛药例数差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05).结论:与传统阴式子宫切除术相比,改良阴式子宫切除术具手术时间短,术中出血量少、术野暴露较充分,术后恢复快等优势,是一种安全有效的子宫切除术式.

关 键 词:改良阴式  子宫良性病变  全子宫切除术

Improved Vaginal Hysterectomy Clinical analysis of 120 cases
Xu Lihui. Improved Vaginal Hysterectomy Clinical analysis of 120 cases[J]. Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine, 2012, 0(26): 27-28
Authors:Xu Lihui
Abstract:Objective: To analyze the improvement of vaginal hysterectomy in benign uterine clinical effect. Methods:In May 2005-2008 120 in our hospital in December improved routine vaginal hysterectomy(improvement group)and 30 patients of traditional vaginal hysterectomy(control group) wcre retrospectively analyzed. Result:The modified group blood loss, operative time, anal exhaust time, postoperative recovery, hospital stay and postoperative morbidity were significantly less than the traditional group(P〈0.05). The average uterine size improvement group(403.5 ± 78.2g), the traditional group(71.4±22.4g) ,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.01) ,but the pain with pain killers no difference in the number of ca- ses significance(P〉0.05). Conclusion: Compared with traditional vaginal hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy modified with a shorter operative time,less blood loss,exposure of the surgical field more fully,and other advantages of rapid recovery, is a safe and effective hysterectomy surgical procedures.
Keywords:Improved vaginal Uterine benign disease Hysterectomy
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号