生物型和骨水泥型股骨假体全髋关节置换术治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨颈骨折的临床效果对比

目的：对比老年骨质疏松股骨颈骨折使用生物型股骨假体柄与骨水泥型股骨假体柄行全髋关节置换术治疗效果。方法对本组进行老年骨质疏松股骨颈骨折100例（100髋）进行的全髋关节置换术根据手术方式分为A组（股骨假体柄骨水泥型全髋关节置换术，60髋）， B组（股骨假体柄生物型全髋关节置换术，40髋）。对比两组髋关节功能、关节活动度、髋关节影像学特点及术后疼痛情况。结果老年骨质疏松股骨颈骨折行全髋关节置换术，采用生物型股骨假体柄与骨水泥型股骨假体柄的全髋关节置换术临床疗效对比差异显著（ P＜0.05）。结论对于老年骨质疏松股骨颈骨折行全髋关节置换术，应用骨水泥型者股骨假体柄术后近期疗效明显优于生物型，但它有诱发深静脉血栓栓塞和骨水泥危象的风险。

Comparison of cementless and bone-cement protheses in total hip arthroplasty for osteoporotic femoral neck fracture in elderly patients

Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of bone-cement stem and cementless stem used in the total hip arthroplasty （ THA） for treating the osteoporotic fracture of the femoral neck in the senile patients .Methods A retrospective study was carried out to analyse 100 cases of osteoporotic femoral neck fracture in the elderly patients who underwent THA in our hospital .The patients were divided into two groups by the operation methods：group A, 60 cases applied bone-cement stem in THA;group B, 40 cases applied cementless stem in THA .The hip joint function , the motion range of the joint , the imaging characteristics of the hip and posoperative pain were all compared between the two groups . Results Therewere significant differences in the clinical therapeutic effects between the two groups （ P〈0.05）.Conclusions The postoperative effects of the bone-cement stem is much better than the cementless stem in THA for the osteoporotic femoral neck fracture in elderly , but it may cause the risks of deep venous thromboembolism and bone cement crisis .