首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

地尔硫卓、尼卡地平预防颅脑术后拔管反应的比较
引用本文:于斌,王云珍,张炜,王保国. 地尔硫卓、尼卡地平预防颅脑术后拔管反应的比较[J]. 实用全科医学, 2011, 0(9): 1351-1353
作者姓名:于斌  王云珍  张炜  王保国
作者单位:首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院麻醉科;首都医科大学第十一临床医学院;北京三博脑科医院麻醉科;
摘    要:目的观察地尔硫卓、尼卡地平预防颅脑术后气管拔管期心血管反应的疗效及使用期间二者对心功能的影响。方法选取60例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,颅脑占位择期行开颅手术患者,随机分为:生理盐水组(C组)、尼卡地平15μg/kg组(N组)、地尔硫卓0.2mg/kg组(D组)。于拔管前2min静注研究用药。记录给药前、给药后、拔管时、拔管后1,3,5,10min的血压(BP)、心率(HR)、心搏指数(SVI)、心指数(cI),计算心率收缩压乘积(RPP=心率×收缩压)。结果与给药前相比,拔管期C组最大平均动脉压(MAPmax)平均升高21.1%、最高心率(HRmax)平均增速32.8%、最大率压积(RPPmax)平均增幅达52.2%(P〈0.01)。D、N两组均能有效地抑制气管拔管引起的血压升高(MAPmax:2.9%VS3.6%,P〉0.05)。与N组相比,D组还有减慢心率的作用(HRmax:12.7%vs24.6%,P〈0.05)。静注地尔硫卓、尼卡地平后cI增加。结论尼卡地平可减轻气管拔管时的升压反应,但不能防止心动过速的发生;地尔硫卓可全面有效地抑制气管拔管时的心血管副反应。

关 键 词:地尔硫卓  尼卡地平  气管拔管  心血管反应

Effect of Diltiazem and Nicardipine on Postoperative Extubation Response in Patients with Intracranial Surgery
YU Bin,WANG Bao-guo,WANG Yun-zhen,et al.. Effect of Diltiazem and Nicardipine on Postoperative Extubation Response in Patients with Intracranial Surgery[J]. Applied Journal Of General Practice, 2011, 0(9): 1351-1353
Authors:YU Bin  WANG Bao-guo  WANG Yun-zhen  et al.
Affiliation:YU Bin,WANG Bao-guo,WANG Yun-zhen,et al.Department of Anesthesiology,Beijng Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy of Nicardipine and Dihiazem on the cardiovascular responses during tracheal extubation and emergence from anesthesia in patients with intracranial surgery, and their negative influence on heart function. Methods Sixty ASA I -II patients with intracranial space-occupying lesion undergoing elective intracranial surgery were randomly divided into 0.9% NS group( Group C) ,0.2 mg/kg Dihiazem group( Group D) and 15 μg/kg Nicardipine group( Group N). The drugs were used two minutes before tracheal extubation. The blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume index (SVI) and cardiac index(CI) was recorded at designed time points : pre-adminstation, post-adminstation,immediate at extubation, 1,3, 5 and l0 min after extubation. And the rate-pressure product (RPP) was calculated. Results Compared with pre-adminstation, the maximum increase of MAP,HR and RPP in group C were 21.1% ,32.8% and 52.2% associated with tracheal extubation (P 〈 0.01 ). The increase of MAP induced by tracheal extubation were depressed both by Nicardipine and Dihiazem( MAPmax: 2.9% vs 3.6% ,P 〉0.05 ). The inhibitory effects of Dihiazem on HR responding to the tracheal extubation were greater than those of Nicardipine( HRmax: 12.7% vs 24.6% ,P 〈 0.01 ). CI increased after the bolus injection of Dihiazem or Nicardipine. Conclusion Nicardipine is effective in depressing pressure response to tracheal extubation but cannot prevent the tachycardia; Dihiazem can produce a greater attenuation on the circulatory responses to tracheal extubation.
Keywords:Diltiazem  Nicardipine  Tracheal extubation and emergence  Cardiovascular responses  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号