首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONTINUOUS INFUSION OF VECURONIUM AND THE INTERMITTENT ADMINISTRATION OF PANCURONIUM AND VECURONIUM
Authors:NOELDGE, G.   HINSKEN, H.   BUZELLO, W.
Affiliation:Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Hugstetter Str. 55, D-7800 Freiburg, Federal Republic of Germany
Abstract:The neuromuscular blocking effects of repeated bolus injectionsof pancuronium, or vecuronium, and of the continuous infusionof vecuronium have been compared in 36 patients by means ofevoked twitch tension Groups I and II received a loading dose(0.075 mg kg–1) of pancuronium or vecuronium, respectively,followed by 0.015-mg kg–1 maintenance doses when twitchtension had recovered to 25%. Group III received a 0.075-mgkg–1 loading dose of vecuronium plus a continuous infusion(commenced simultaneously) delivering 0.075 mg kg–1 h–1.With repeated injections of pancuronium (group I) or vecuronium(group II), the durations of blockade to 25% recovery were 64and 25 min, respectively. Maintenance doses had to be injectedevery 42 min with pancuronium and every 12 min with vecuronium.The recovery times from 25% to 75% of control twitch tensionwere 44 v. 12 min. The continuous infusion of vecuronium (groupIII) produced consistent neuromuscular blockade at an averagelevel of 87% twitch depression. The times from the end of infusionto 25%, and from 25% to 75%, recovery averaged 20 and 26 min,respectively. These values did not correlate with the totaldose of vecuronium infused. For clinical practice, the suggestedloading dose is 1.5 times the ED90 (= 0.07 mg kg–1) followedby an infusion of the same dose per hour. The infusion shouldbe started within 10 min of the injection of the loading dose.
Keywords:
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号