Hemifacial spasm caused by a tortuous recurrent perforating artery: A case report |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Medical-Surgical Research Center, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia;2. Neurosurgeon-Critical Care, Biomedical Research Center, University of Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia;1. Service de Neurochirurgie B, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France;2. University Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, 33000 Bordeaux, France;3. CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, 33000 Bordeaux, France;1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chongqing Health Centre for Women and Children, Chongqing, 120 Longshan Road, Chongqing 400013, China;2. Department of Emergency, Chongqing Health Centre for Women and Children, Chongqing, 120 Longshan Road, Chongqing 400013, China;1. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, 23 Kyunghee-daero, Dongdaemun-gu, 130-701 Seoul, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea |
| |
Abstract: | IntroductionWhen the culprit vessel in hemifacial spasm (HFS) is hard to determine, this is a challenge in microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery. In such a situation, small arteries such as perforators to the brainstem might be suspected. But small arteries are omnipresent near the facial nerve root exit/entry zone (fREZ). How to decide whether a given small artery is responsible for HFS is unclear.MethodWe report a case with a previously unreported form of neurovascular impingement, in which the culprit was found to be the recurrent perforating artery (RPA) from the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA). An aberrant anatomic configuration of the RPA was found intraoperatively, which we thought was responsible for generating focal pressure on the facial nerve.Case reportA 62-year-old woman presented with a 1-year history of paroxysmal but increasingly frequent twitching in her right face. MRI showed tortuosity of the vertebral artery and apparently marked neurovascular impingement on the asymptomatic left side, while only the right AICA could be implicated as the possible culprit. Hemifacial spasm was diagnosed based on the typical clinical manifestation, and MVD was performed. The pre-meatal segment of the AICA was found not to be impinging the facial nerve at any susceptible portion near the fREZ: root exit point, attached segment, or root detachment point. The real culprit was in fact the RPA. This occult culprit vessel was tortuous, forming a coil-shaped twist which was interposed between the facial nerve and the intermediate nerve near the root detachment point. Focal pressure atrophy of the nerve was clearly observed at the compressing site. The patient achieved total spasm relief immediately after surgery, and remained spasm-free at 1-year follow-up, without any postoperative complications.ConclusionMVD is the only curative treatment for hemifacial spasm, but with a failure rate of around 10%. Mistaking the real culprit has been reported to be the most likely reason for surgical failure. Therefore, intraoperative identification of atypical occult forms of vascular compression is of importance to improve surgical outcome. In the present case, the RPA formed a coil-shaped twist, which inflicted focal vascular compression causing hemifacial spasm. We recommend careful inspection of the recurrent perforating artery during MVD for HFS, and decompressing any such neurovascular impingement. |
| |
Keywords: | Anatomy Anterior inferior cerebellar artery Hemifacial spasm Microvascular decompression Recurrent perforating artery |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|