焦虑症患者心理控制源与应付方式的关系研究

目的研究焦虑症患者的心理控制源和应付方式特点,并探讨二者的关系。方法采用内控性、有势力的他人及机遇量表(IPC)和应付方式问卷(Cop ing S ty le Scale)对32例焦虑症患者进行评定并进行统计分析。结果①描述性统计分析结果显示,焦虑症患者的机遇心理控制源得分最高(3.48±0.82)分,其次是内控、有势力他人分别为(3.13±0.72)分和(3.04±1.02)分;②描述性统计分析结果显示,幻想、自责的应付方式得分最高分别为(0.69±0.20)分和(0.63±0.25)分,求助、合理化、解决问题的应付方式得分最低[分别为(0.43±0.16)分、(0.45±0.18)分和(0.55±0.29)分];③相关分析结果显示,焦虑症患者心理控制源与应付方式呈显著相关(P<0.05);④线性回归分析结果显示,机遇心理控制源对成熟应付方式具有显著的负向预测效果(F=4.743,P<0.01),有势力他人心理控制源对不成熟应对方式具有显著的正向预测效果(F=7.121,P<0.01),内控性和机遇心理控制源对混合型应对方式具有显著的正向预测效果(F=16.741,P<0.001)。结论焦虑症患者面临应激事件时倾向于采用不成熟的应付方式,这与其心理控制源有密切联系。

Relationship between Locus of Control and Coping Styles of Anxiety Patients

Objective To evaluate the locus of control and coping styles of anxiety patients in Chengdu and their relationship.Methods Applied IPC Scale and Coping Style Scale to evaluate 32 anxiety patients and gave an analysis.Results ①The score of chance was the highest（3.48±0.82）,and the scores of internal health locus of control and powerful others were（3.04±1.02） and（3.13±0.72） respectively.②The scores of fantasy and remorse were high,which were（0.69±0.20） and（0.63±0.25） respectively.The scores of seek for help,rationalization and solve problems were low,which were（0.43±0.16）,（0.45±0.18） and（0.55±0.29）.③There was a significant correlation between locus of control and coping styles of anxiety patients（P0.05）.④Chance was a negative predictor of mature coping style（F=4.743,P0.01）.Powerful others was a positive predictor of immature coping style（F=7.121,P0.01）.Internality and chance were positive predictors of mixed coping style.Conclusion The anxiety patients always use immature coping styles,which is significantly related to locus of control.