Effects of projection and background correction method upon calculation of right ventricular ejection fraction using first-pass radionuclide angiography |
| |
Authors: | John L. Caplin William D. Flatman Duncan S. Dymond |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Cardiology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, EC1A 7BE West Smithfield, London, UK;(2) Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital London, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Summary There is no consensus as to the best projection or correction method for first-pass radionuclide studies of the right ventricle. We assessed the effects of two commonly used projections, 30° right anterior oblique and anterior-posterior, on the calculation of right ventricular ejection fraction. In addition two background correction methods, planar background correction to account for scatter, and right atrial correction to account for right atrio-ventricular overlap were assessed. Two first-pass radionuclide angiograms were performed in 19 subjects, one in each projection, using gold-195m (half-life 30.5 seconds), and each study was analysed using the two methods of correction. Right ventricular ejection fraction was highest using the right anterior oblique projection with right atrial correction 35.6 ± 12.5% (mean ± SD), and lowest when using the anterior posterior projection with planar background correction 26.2 ± 11% (p<0.001). The study design allowed assessment of the effects of correction method and projection independently. Correction method appeared to have relatively little effect on right ventricular ejection fraction. Using right atrial correction correlation coefficient (r) between projections was 0.92, and for planar background correction r = 0.76, both p<0.001. However, right ventricular ejection fraction was far more dependent upon projection. When the anterior-posterior projection was used calculated right ventricular ejection fraction was much more dependent on correction method (r = 0.65, p = not significant), than using the right anterior oblique projection (r = 0.85, p<0.001). Comparison of the two methods currently used in clinical studies, showed no significant differences between the means, and r = 0.83 with a standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 7.4%. These data show that the calculation of right ventricular ejection fraction from right anterior oblique studies is less dependent on correction method, and suggest that its use as a standard method which will allow comparisons of results between centres. |
| |
Keywords: | right ventricle first-pass radionuclide angiography |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|