精神分析治疗与嗜酒者互诫协会对降低酒依赖患者复饮率的效果 |
| |
引用本文: | 张旭兰,鲍建军,张丽梅,杨爽艺,刘红艳. 精神分析治疗与嗜酒者互诫协会对降低酒依赖患者复饮率的效果[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 2016, 0(4): 396-399. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2016.04.006 |
| |
作者姓名: | 张旭兰 鲍建军 张丽梅 杨爽艺 刘红艳 |
| |
作者单位: | 650011,云南省精神病医院 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的:比较精神分析治疗与嗜酒者互诫协会(AA)对降低酒依赖患者复饮率的有效性。方法将108例酒依赖患者随机分为精神分析治疗组(n =54)与 AA 治疗组(n =54),治疗时间为16周。两组患者在给予常规治疗的基础上,精神分析治疗组进行每周两次的精神分析治疗,AA 组进行每周三下午的 AA 活动,在治疗前、治疗4周末、8周末、12周末、16周末,分别给予汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评估,在治疗前与治疗16周末分别使用症状自评量表(SCL -90)对两组患者进行评定,出院后6个月内保持每月一到两次的电话随访或门诊复查,以了解患者复饮的情况。结果两组治疗前HAMD 、SCL -90评分比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。治疗后两组 HAMD 评分均明显下降,且治疗后8,12,16周末精神分析治疗组评分低于 AA 治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.01)。治疗后SCL -90评分中除精神病性障碍因子外,两组评分均较治疗前明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),且精神分析治疗组躯体化、焦虑、抑郁、敌对、人际关系敏感和睡眠饮食不良评分优于 AA 治疗组,差异亦有统计学意义(P <0.05)。出院后6个月两组复饮率比较,精神分析治疗组30.4%(14/54)低于 AA 组39.1%(18/54),但差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.431,P =0.511);多因素 Cox 回归分析表明:精神分析治疗或 AA 治疗、对酒的依赖程度是影响酒依赖患者复饮率的因素。结论精神分析治疗与AA 对于酒依赖患者复饮率的降低均有明显效果,两组总体比较精神分析治疗组优于 AA 组,在治疗过程中精神分析治疗对于患者疾病的缓解明显优于 AA ,在出院后复饮率的比较上,两者差异不明显。
|
关 键 词: | 酒依赖 精神分析治疗 嗜酒者互诫协会 复饮率 |
Effectiveness of psychoanalysis and alcoholics anonymous on reducing re - drinking rate among patients with alcohol dependence |
| |
Abstract: | Objective To compare the effectiveness of psychoanalysis and alcoholics anonymous (AA) on reducing re - drinking rate among patients with alcohol dependence .Methods Totals of 108 pa-tients with alcohol dependence were randomly divided into psychoanalytic treatment group (n = 54) and AA treatment group (n = 54) .Treatment time was 16 weeks .On the basis of given routine therapy to patients in both groups ,patients with psychoanalytic treatment were given psychoanalytic therapy twice a week , and holding alcoholics anonymous activity for patients with AA treatment group on every Wednesday afternoon ,assessing each group of patients by Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD) before treatment ,after 4 ,8 ,12 ,16 weeks of treatment ,evaluating each group of patients by Symptom Self -assessment Scale(SCL - 90) before treatment and after 16 weeks of treatment ,keeping 1 or 2 times a month of telephone follow - up or outpatient care within 6 months after the patients discharged ,in order to understand the patients're - drinking situation .Results The scores of HAMD and SCL - 90 showed no significant difference before treatment (P > 0 .05) .HAMD scores were significantly decreased in two groups after treatment ,and the score in psychoanalytic treatment group were lower than AA treatment group after 8 ,12 ,16 weeks of treatment ,the difference were statistically significant (P < 0.01) .After treatment ,SCL - 90 score except the psychiatric disorder factor ,the score in two groups were improved obviously before treatment ,the difference were statistically significant (P < 0 .05) ,and the score of so-matization ,anxiety ,depression ,hostility ,interpersonal sensitivity and poor sleep and diet in psychoana-lytic treatment group were better than those in AA treatment group ,the difference were also statistically significant (P < 0 .05) .Compared re - drinking rate 6 months after hospital discharge ,the psychoanalytic treatment group was 30 .4% (14/54) was lower than the AA treatment group 39 .1% (18/54) ,but there was no statistically significant difference (χ2 = 0 .431 ,P = 0 .511) .Cox regression analysis showed that psychoanalytic treatment or AA treatment ,the degree of dependence on alcohol were factors influencing the re - drinking rate of alcohol - dependent patients .Conclusions Both psychoanalysis and AA treatment have obvious influence on reducing re - drinking rate among patients with alcohol dependence , compared with the two groups ,psychoanalytic treatment group was better than the AA group ,for dis-ease remission ,psychoanalytic treatment is better than the AA ,in the comparison of re - drinking rate after hospital discharge ,the difference is not significant . |
| |
Keywords: | Alcohol dependence Psychoanalysis treatment Alcoholic anonymous Re -drinking rate |
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|