首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


High irradiance curing and anomalies of exposure reciprocity law in resin-based materials
Authors:Hadis M  Leprince J G  Shortall A C  Devaux J  Leloup G  Palin W M
Affiliation:a Biomaterials Unit, University of Birmingham, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, St Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, UK
b School of Dentistry and Stomatology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
c Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences - Bio & Soft Matter, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Place Croixdu Sud 1, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
d CRIBIO (Center of Research and Engineering of Biomaterials), Brussels, Belgium
Abstract:

Objectives

The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of high irradiance curing on resultant degree of conversion of ‘flowable’ resin composites and their counterpart higher viscosity paste materials.

Methods

Five commercial flowable materials (Venus; Heraeus Kulzer, Synergy D6; Coltene, Premise; Kerr, Grandio; Voco and Gradia; GC Corp) and their counterpart higher viscosity restorative versions were tested. Specimens were cured with a halogen Swiss Master Light (EMS, Switzerland) using five different curing protocols with similar radiant exposure (18 J/cm2): 400 mW/cm2 for 45 s, 900 mW/cm2 for 20 s, 1500 mW/cm2 for 12 s, 2000 mW/cm2 for 9 s and 3000 mW/cm2 for 6 s. Degree of conversion (DC) was measured in real time by Fourier transform near infrared spectroscopy (FT-NIRS).

Results

Three- and subsequent two way ANOVA testing revealed significant differences (p ≤ 0.02) with respect to “composite type” and “cure protocol” for DC for all 5 product comparisons. Supplementary one-way ANOVA also revealed significant differences between curing protocols (p < 0.05). The majority of higher viscosity resin composite paste materials exhibited similar DC regardless of curing protocol. However, a significant decrease in DC for specimens cured at 3000 mW/cm2 for 6 s compared with 400 mW/cm2 for 45 s was observed for the flowable materials, Grandio (41 ± 0.36 and 62 ± 1.15%, respectively) and Venus (44 ± 0.44 and 67 ± 0.44%, respectively). Conversely, other flowable materials exhibited little or no significant differences between curing modes. Generally, a higher degree of conversion was observed for flowables compared with their more viscous counterpart, except at high irradiance for those materials where a reciprocal relationship with exposure time was not observed.

Conclusions

The validity of exposure reciprocity law and final degree of conversion depends on several factors, amongst which resin viscosity and filler content were important. Practitioners should be aware of the importance of resin composite constituents and irradiation protocols. Information on material composition and appropriate radiation sources by manufacturers may assist practitioners with the selection of appropriate curing protocols for specific material/light curing unit combinations with the aim of reducing the incidence of under-cured restorations and the clinical impact thereof.
Keywords:Resin-based composites   Degree of conversion   Light intensity   Exposure reciprocity law   Flowable   Resin chemistry   Viscosity
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号