首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Long-term evaluation of water sorption and ultimate tensile strength of HEMA-containing/-free one-step self-etch adhesives
Authors:Takahashi Masahiro  Nakajima Masatoshi  Hosaka Keiichi  Ikeda Masaomi  Foxton Richard M  Tagami Junji
Affiliation:a Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan
b School of Dental Technology, Faculty of Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan
c Division of Conservative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's and St Thomas’ Hospitals, King's College London, London Bridge, London SE1-9RT, UK
d Global Center of Excellence Program, International Research Center for Molecular Science in Tooth and Bone Diseases, Japan
Abstract:

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the water sorption (Wsp) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of HEMA-containing/free one-step self-etch adhesives after long-term water-storage.

Methods

Three HEMA-containing one-step self-etch adhesives (Bond Force (BF), Clearfil S3 Bond (S3) and OptiBond All-In-One (OP)), and one HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive, G Bond (GB) was used. After the solvents of each adhesive were evaporated, polymerised adhesive disks and dumbbell-shaped specimens of thirty-two each were prepared and divided into four groups of 14-, 90-, 180- and 360-day water-storage. After immersion in water for the designated storage periods, the disks were subjected to measurement of Wsp, and the dumbbell-shaped specimens were subjected to measurement of UTS. The data of Wsp and UTS were statistically analysed using a two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test.

Results

Wsp of BF, S3 and OP increased over time, whereas for GB, there were no significant differences in Wsp among all the storage periods. Wsp of GB was lower than those of BF, S3 and OP in each period. The UTS of BF, S3 and OP decreased over time, whereas for GB, there were no significant differences in UTS among all storage periods. The highest UTS was initially seen in BF > GB = S3 = OP, and after 360-day water-storage, seen in BF = GB > OP = S3.

Conclusions

For the HEMA-containing adhesives, Wsp increased and UTS decreased over time. On the other hand, for the HEMA-free adhesive, Wsp and UTS did not significantly change even after 360-day water-storage.
Keywords:One-step self-etch adhesives   Polymers   Ultimate tensile strength   Water sorption   HEMA
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号