Value of Risk Stratification to Increase the Predictive Validity of HbA1c in Screening for Undiagnosed Diabetes in the US Population |
| |
Authors: | Adit A Ginde MD MPH Enrico Cagliero MD David M Nathan MD Carlos A Camargo Jr MD DrPH |
| |
Institution: | (1) Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA;(2) Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA;(3) Diabetes Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA;(4) Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Background Opportunistic screening using hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) may improve detection of undiagnosed diabetes but remains controversial.
Objective To evaluate the predictive validity of HbA1c as a screening test for undiagnosed diabetes in a risk-stratified sample of the
US population.
Design Weighted cross-sectional analysis of diabetes risk factors, HbA1c, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999–2004.
Subjects Six thousand seven hundred and twenty-three NHANES participants from morning examination session, aged ≥18 years and without
prior physician-diagnosed diabetes.
Measurements HbA1c and undiagnosed diabetes defined by FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/l (126 mg/dl).
Results The estimated prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes in the US population was 2.8% (5.5 million people). HbA1c had strong correlation
with undiagnosed diabetes, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.93. Independent predictors
of undiagnosed diabetes were older age, male sex, black race, hypertension, elevated waist circumference, elevated triglycerides,
and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. We derived a risk score for undiagnosed diabetes and stratified participants
into low (0.44% prevalence), moderate (4.1% prevalence), and high (11.1% prevalence) risk subgroups. In moderate and high
risk groups, a threshold HbA1c value ≥ 6.1% identified patients requiring confirmatory FPG; HbA1c ≤ 5.4% identified patients
for whom diabetes could be reliably excluded. Intermediate HbA1c (5.5–6.0%) may exclude diabetes in moderate, but not high
risk groups).
Conclusions Risk stratification improves the predictive validity of HbA1c in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the US population.
Although opportunistic screening with HbA1c would improve detection of undiagnosed diabetes, cost-effectiveness studies are
needed before implementation of specific screening strategies using HbA1c. |
| |
Keywords: | diabetes mellitus glycohemoglobin screening validity NHANES |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|