| 酚试剂法与快速仪器法检测室内空气中甲醛浓度的实验对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李世杰,付韬,郑雯.酚试剂法与快速仪器法检测室内空气中甲醛浓度的实验对比[J].河南预防医学杂志,2014(3):182-183. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李世杰 付韬 郑雯 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 漯河市疾病预防控制中心; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的对比酚试剂法与快速仪器法在检测室内空气中甲醛浓度的结果差异,验证快速仪器法的实用性。方法分别采用酚试剂法与快速仪器法对室内空气中不同浓度甲醛进行检测,结果进行统计学分析。结果检测结果经统计学分析,t0.05,快速仪器法与国标酚试剂法两种方法检测结果差别无显著意义。结论快速仪器法可满足现场快速检测需要。
|
| 关 键 词： | 仪器法 酚试剂比色法 对比试验 |
Comparative Study of Determination of Formaldehyde in Indoor Air by Rapid Instrumental Method and MBTH Spectrophotometric Method |
| |
| LI Shi-jie,FU Tao,ZHENG Wen.Comparative Study of Determination of Formaldehyde in Indoor Air by Rapid Instrumental Method and MBTH Spectrophotometric Method[J].Henan Journal of Preventive Medicine,2014(3):182-183. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Shi-jie FU Tao ZHENG Wen |
| |
| Institution: | (Luohe Municipal Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Luohe, Henan, 462001, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective Comparing the result of formaldehyde concentration detected by rapid instrumental method and MBTH spectrophotometric method, testing the effectiveness of rapid instrumental method. Methods Detecting various concentration of formaldehyde in indoor air by rapid instrumental method and MBTH spectrophotometric method, analysing the result by statistical method. Results Two method of determination of formaldehyde in indoor air have no Statistical differences. Conclusions Rapid instrumental method is suitable for the spot detecting. |
| |
| Keywords: | MBTH spectrophotometric method instrumental method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
