首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

舒铂生物材料鼻支架与自体肋软骨鼻支架在隆鼻术中的应用效果
引用本文:朱禹萱. 舒铂生物材料鼻支架与自体肋软骨鼻支架在隆鼻术中的应用效果[J]. 医学美学美容, 2024, 33(1): 101-104
作者姓名:朱禹萱
作者单位:中国医科大学空军特色医学中心烧伤整形外科
摘    要:比较舒铂生物材料鼻支架与自体肋软骨鼻支架在隆鼻术中的应用效果。方法 抽取中国医科大学空军特色医学中心2021年4月-2023年5月收治的100例隆鼻术患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各50例,对照组予以自体肋软骨鼻支架隆鼻术治疗,观察组予以舒铂生物材料鼻支架隆鼻术治疗,比较两组并发症发生情况、切口愈合情况及鼻部美学指标水平。结果 观察组并发症发生率为2.00%,低于对照组的8.00%,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);观察组切口Ⅰ级愈合率为88.00%,略低于对照组的92.00%,但差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);两组术后6个月鼻面角、鼻尖角均高于术前,且观察组高于对照组(P <0.05)。结论 采用舒铂生物材料鼻支架、自体肋软骨鼻支架进行隆鼻术术后后并发症发生风险及切口愈合情况相近,而舒铂生物材料鼻支架隆鼻术鼻部美学效果更佳,值得临床应用。

关 键 词:隆鼻术;舒铂生物材料鼻支架;自体肋软骨鼻支架

Application Effect of SU-POR Biomaterial Nasal Stent and Autologous Costal CartilageNasal Stent in Rhinoplasty
ZHU Yu-xuan. Application Effect of SU-POR Biomaterial Nasal Stent and Autologous Costal CartilageNasal Stent in Rhinoplasty[J]. Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology, 2024, 33(1): 101-104
Authors:ZHU Yu-xuan
Affiliation:Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Air Force Special Medical Center
Abstract:To compare the application effect of SU-POR biomaterial nasal stent and autologous costal cartilagenasal stent in rhinoplasty. Methods A total of 100 patients with rhinoplasty admitted to Air Force Special Medical Center,China Medical University from April 2021 to May 2023 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into controlgroup and observation group by random number table method, with 50 patients in each group. The control group receivedautologous costal cartilage nasal stent for rhinoplasty, while the observation group received SU-POR biomaterial nasal stentfor rhinoplasty. The incidence of complications, wound healing rate and nasal aesthetic index level were compared betweenthe two groups.Results The incidence of complications in the observation group was 2.00%, which was lower than 8.00%in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P >0.05). The grade Ⅰ healing rate of incision inthe observation group was 88.00%, which was slightly lower than 92.00% in the control group, and the difference was notstatistically significant (P >0.05). The nasal facial angle and nasal tip angle of the two groups at 6 months after operation werehigher than those before operation, and those of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P <0.05).Conclusion The risk of complications and wound healing after augmentation rhinoplasty with SU-POR biomaterial nasalstent and autologous costal cartilage nasal stent are similar, while the aesthetic effect of SU-POR biomaterial nasal stent isbetter and worthy of clinical application.
Keywords:Rhinoplasty   SU-POR biomaterial nasal stent   Autologous costal cartilage nasal stent
点击此处可从《医学美学美容》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《医学美学美容》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号