首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Contribution of equilibrative nucleoside transporters 1 and 2 to gemcitabine uptake in pancreatic cancer cells
Authors:Masato Hioki  Takuya Shimada  Tian Yuan  Takeo Nakanishi  Hidehiro Tajima  Maiko Yamazaki  Rina Yokono  Makiko Takabayashi  Kazuki Sawamoto  Gaku Akashita  Ken‐Ichi Miyamoto  Tetsuo Ohta  Ikumi Tamai  Tsutomu Shimada  Yoshimichi Sai
Affiliation:1. Department of Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;2. Department of Pharmacy, Local Independent Administrative Institution Mie Prefectural General Medical Center, Yokkaichi City, Mie, Japan;3. Department of Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;4. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Membrane Transport and Biopharmaceutics, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;5. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Division of Cancer Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
Abstract:Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy is expected to be a more effective and safer method to treat the hepatic metastasis of pancreatic cancer than intravenous (iv) administration because of higher tumor exposure and lower systemic exposure. To clarify the uptake mechanism of nucleoside anticancer drugs, including gemcitabine (GEM), in pancreatic cancer, we investigated the uptakes of radiolabeled uridine (a general substrate of nucleoside transporters) and GEM in pancreatic cancer cell lines MIA‐PaCa2 and As‐PC1. Uridine uptake was inhibited by non‐labeled GEM and also by S‐(4‐nitrobenzyl)‐6‐thioinosine (NBMPR; an inhibitor of equilibrative nucleoside transporters, ENTs) in a concentration‐dependent manner, suggesting that ENTs contribute to uridine uptake in pancreatic cancer cells. As for GEM, saturable uptake was mediated by high‐ and low‐affinity components with Km values of micromolar and millimolar orders, respectively. Uptake was inhibited in a concentration‐dependent manner by NBMPR and was sodium ion‐independent. Moreover, the concentration dependence of uptake in the presence of 0.1 μM NBMPR showed a single low‐affinity site. These results indicated that the high‐ and low‐affinity sites correspond to hENT1 and hENT2, respectively. The results indicated that at clinically relevant hepatic concentrations of GEM in GEM‐HAI therapy, the metastatic tumor exposure of GEM is predominantly determined by hENT2 under unsaturated conditions, suggesting that hENT2 expression in metastatic tumor would be a candidate biomarker for indicating anticancer therapy with GEM‐HAI.
Keywords:equilibrative nucleoside transporters  gemcitabine  pancreatic cancer cell  uptake kinetics
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号